Interviews 02
Interviews 02
January 14, 2026

Iranian Deputy FM Saeed Khatibzadeh: All-Out War? Iran Says It’s Ready for Any Attack

Quick Read

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister details a 'coordinated assassination operation' by the US and Israel, framing recent conflict as a strategic failure for the aggressors and a demonstration of Iran's advanced defense capabilities and national unity.
June 13th attack was a 'coordinated assassination operation' by US/Israel, not a counterintelligence failure for Iran.
Iran claims 100% missile penetration against Israeli/US defenses, demonstrating advanced capabilities.
Negotiations were a 'theater' to prepare for war; Iran's resilience forced a shift from 'unconditional surrender' to 'unconditional ceasefire'.

Summary

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh asserts that the recent conflict with Israel, which he describes as a 'coordinated assassination operation' by Israelis and Americans on June 13th, was a strategic miscalculation by the aggressors. He claims that negotiations preceding the attack were a 'theater' designed to lull Iran into a false sense of security, with the US seeking 'submission' rather than genuine compromise. Khatibzadeh highlights Iran's successful defense, including a 100% penetration rate for its precision missiles despite multiple interception systems, and the unexpected national unity that emerged. He condemns the unprecedented attack on Iran's UN-safeguarded nuclear facilities and criticizes the IAEA's failure to condemn it. The Deputy FM also discusses the 'Westlessness' phenomenon, suggesting a decline in Western influence and the emergence of a new, non-West-centric world order, while warning that future 'adventurism' could escalate into an 'all-out war' in the Persian Gulf.
This interview provides a rare, direct insight into Iran's official strategic calculus and its interpretation of recent geopolitical events, particularly the conflict with Israel and the US. Understanding Iran's framing of these events—from perceived Western 'dictation' in negotiations to its claims of military prowess and national resilience—is crucial for assessing future regional stability, the efficacy of international diplomacy, and the evolving global power dynamics. It offers a counter-narrative to Western media, emphasizing Iran's capabilities and resolve against perceived aggression.

Takeaways

  • The June 13th aggression was a 'delicate, coordinated assassination operation' by Israelis and Americans, planned months in advance, targeting off-duty Iranian commanders and their families.
  • Pre-attack negotiations in Oslo and Oman were seen by Iran as a 'theater' or 'conspiracy' to create a false sense of comfort, with the US seeking 'submission' rather than genuine compromise.
  • Iran views the attack on its UN-safeguarded nuclear facilities as an unprecedented and grave violation of international law, criticizing the IAEA for its failure to condemn it.
  • Despite Israeli/US claims, Iran asserts a '100% penetration rate' for its precision missiles, overwhelming multiple advanced interception systems.
  • The conflict demonstrated Iran's intelligence penetration into 'occupied territory' (Israel) and its ability to efficiently target military and intelligence headquarters.
  • The shift from President Trump's 'unconditional surrender' tweet on day three to a request for 'unconditional ceasefire' on day twelve signifies Iran's successful defense and ability to inflict pain.
  • The aggression was a 'total strategic failure' for regime change, as it fostered unexpected national unity in Iran, contrasting with Israelis fleeing the country.
  • Iran warns against new 'adventurism,' stating that future aggression could escalate into an 'all-out war' with spillover into the Persian Gulf.
  • The Deputy FM observes a global trend of 'Westlessness,' indicating a decline in Western strategic relevance and the emergence of a new, non-West-centric world order.

Insights

1Coordinated Assassination and Deceptive Diplomacy

Iranian Deputy FM Khatibzadeh states the June 13th aggression was a 'very delicate, coordinated assassination operation' by Israelis and Americans, targeting off-duty commanders with their families. He insists it required months of planning, with evidence pointing to CIA and Mossad collaboration. He further alleges that preceding negotiations, including those in Oslo and a planned meeting in Oman, were a 'theater' or 'conspiracy' by the US to create a false sense of security, as President Trump later admitted involvement in the operation.

Khatibzadeh describes being in Oslo for nuclear negotiations hours before the attack, planning a breakthrough with the US. He recounts being woken at 3 AM by his wife as the aggression began. He states, 'CIA and Mossad were all together in data collecting, in planning, and also in operation of assassinating our off-duty commanders.' He also notes, 'President Trump accepted himself that he was part of this operation.'

2Iran's Military Effectiveness and Intelligence Penetration

Khatibzadeh challenges the notion of Iranian counterintelligence failure, framing the June 13th event as 'our September 11th moment.' He claims that while Israel (labeled 'the best assassin of the world') successfully targeted generals, Iran's core intelligence apparatus remained untouched. He details how Iran, despite lacking military satellites and facing Israeli data manipulation, effectively targeted and destroyed Israeli intelligence and military headquarters during 'True Promise one and True Promise two,' demonstrating deep penetration into 'occupied territory' (Israel).

Khatibzadeh highlights that 'the intelligence apparatus of Iran was very much remained untouched. They tried to attack the minister of intelligence of Iran. They badly failed.' He further explains, 'How Iran could not only target, but efficiently target and demolish and destroy many many important headquarters, intelligence, and military headquarters in occupied Palestine.'

3100% Missile Penetration Against Advanced Defenses

The Deputy FM asserts that Iran achieved a '100% penetration rate' with its pinpointing missiles during the conflict, despite facing a multi-layered defense system. He describes Israel's seven-plus interception systems, including three layers in Israel, US-installed systems, NATO members' contributions, and a 5,000 km range radar in the Persian Gulf providing 8-12 minutes of warning. He cites an example on day seven where a single Iranian missile, launched after a period of calm, successfully hit its target, sending a clear message of Iran's capability.

Khatibzadeh states, 'It was 100% penetration rate because... when we wanted to hit, wherever whenever, we could we could do that.' He describes the day seven incident: 'Iran just launched one missile and gave them all the opportunity to intercept that for between 8 to 12 minutes... They couldn't do that. And that missile not only heated the the target but also demolished and and and the wave was was detected in many surrounding countries.'

4Strategic Failure for Regime Change and Unprecedented Unity

Khatibzadeh dismisses the aggression as a 'total strategic failure' for any regime change objectives. He refutes the 'mis-argument' that Iran was on the verge of collapse and its people would revolt. Instead, he highlights an 'unexpected level of unity' among the Iranian nation during the war, with Iranians abroad actively seeking to return and defend their country, contrasting this with reports of Israelis fleeing. He points to the shift from Trump's 'unconditional surrender' demand to a request for 'unconditional ceasefire' as proof of Iran's successful defense.

Khatibzadeh states, 'during the war there was no even one voice of opposition and there was a very huge unity among the nation to the extent that even me as a as a as a professor of political science I was not I was not expecting that level of unity.' He adds, 'many Israelis were buying 20,000 dollars worth of ticket to just flee from Israel.'

Bottom Line

The attack on UN-safeguarded nuclear facilities represents a new, dangerous precedent in international law, with the IAEA's silence signaling a weakening of global regulatory bodies.

So What?

This sets a dangerous precedent where peaceful nuclear infrastructure, even under international safeguards, can be targeted with impunity, increasing the risk of proliferation and regional instability. It undermines the authority and effectiveness of the IAEA.

Impact

International legal and diplomatic efforts could be mobilized to reinforce the sanctity of safeguarded nuclear facilities and strengthen the IAEA's mandate to condemn such attacks, preventing future escalations.

The concept of 'Westlessness' and the 'riot from the periphery against the center' indicates a fundamental shift in global power dynamics, moving towards a non-West-centric world order.

So What?

This suggests a decline in the unipolar dominance of the West, leading to increased multipolarity, ad hoc alliances, and opportunistic partnerships. Businesses and governments must adapt to a more fragmented and unpredictable international landscape.

Impact

Non-Western nations and emerging powers can leverage this shift to forge new alliances, strengthen regional blocs, and assert greater influence in global governance, potentially leading to new economic and diplomatic opportunities outside traditional Western frameworks.

Lessons

  • Monitor official statements from Iranian leadership to understand their strategic framing of conflicts and negotiations, as these narratives inform their foreign policy decisions.
  • Analyze the specific claims regarding missile penetration and intelligence capabilities, as these indicate potential advancements in Iran's military technology and operational reach.
  • Evaluate the implications of 'Westlessness' and the decline of Western strategic relevance for international partnerships and regional security architectures, especially in the Middle East.
  • Consider the potential for escalation into an 'all-out war' in the Persian Gulf if 'new adventurism' is pursued, and assess the risks for energy markets and global trade routes.

Notable Moments

The shift from 'unconditional surrender' to 'unconditional ceasefire' in 9 days.

This rapid change in demands, from a position of absolute dominance to one of seeking a truce, is presented by Iran as definitive proof of their successful defense and ability to inflict significant costs on the aggressors, fundamentally altering the strategic calculus.

The attack on UN-safeguarded peaceful nuclear facilities.

This is highlighted as an unprecedented violation of international law, setting a dangerous global precedent and exposing the perceived failure of international bodies like the IAEA to uphold their mandate, which could have long-term implications for nuclear non-proliferation.

Quotes

"

"Peace was a cover up for hegemony and strength was a cover up for use of force."

Saeed Khatibzadeh
"

"Iran is the oldest living continuous civilization on Earth. And this civilization cannot be subjected to this sort of bullying."

Saeed Khatibzadeh
"

"The best assassin of the world, let's call it the Israeli regime. I'm not going to challenge this label for them because they are born to be assassins."

Saeed Khatibzadeh
"

"A journey from unconditional surrender to unconditional ceasefire is a journey of a very proud nation of Iran to defend successfully not only the country, but also being able to push back and, you know, put a lot of pain and burden on the shoulders of the aggressors."

Saeed Khatibzadeh
"

"Many Europeans are party to the genocide and crime against humanity which happened in Gaza and which is happening right now in Palestine. And this is a fact."

Saeed Khatibzadeh
"

"Liberal West is in turmoil... we are entering into a new world order that that is not very much West-centric."

Saeed Khatibzadeh

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes