Quick Read

A combat surgeon and congressional candidate dissects the dangerous rhetoric of 'negotiating with bombs' and the implications for US military ethics and international law.
Military leaders' 'bomb first' rhetoric is historically ineffective and leads to prolonged conflict.
Targeting civilian infrastructure, as proposed for Iran, violates international law and invites retaliation.
Troops must distinguish between supporting their comrades and rejecting illegal orders from leadership.

Summary

Host Ken Harbaugh interviews Dr. Adam Hamawi, a combat surgeon and congressional candidate, about the alarming statements from Secretary of Defense Pete Hexth regarding 'negotiating with bombs' and former President Trump's threats to target Iranian civilian infrastructure. Hamawi, drawing on his experience in Iraq and Gaza, argues that such tactics are ineffective, undermine US legitimacy, and violate international law, making the US less safe. He emphasizes the critical distinction between supporting military personnel and holding political and military leaders accountable for illegal orders, referencing the Nuremberg trials. Hamawi also discusses his campaign platform, focusing on domestic issues like healthcare affordability and contrasting them with the immense costs of war.
The discussion highlights the critical dangers of flippant war rhetoric from high-ranking officials, particularly its potential to normalize actions that violate international law and endanger civilians. It underscores the ethical dilemma faced by military personnel when confronted with potentially illegal orders and the importance of civilian leadership understanding the real-world consequences of military action. This perspective is vital for voters considering candidates who prioritize accountability and a nuanced approach to foreign policy.

Takeaways

  • Secretary of Defense Pete Hexth's comments about 'negotiating with bombs' and Trump's threats against Iranian civilian infrastructure are dangerous and reflect a 'blood lust' that alarms military professionals.
  • Dr. Adam Hamawi, a combat surgeon, asserts that 'negotiating with bombs' is ineffective, citing the failures in Iraq and Afghanistan where 'shock and awe' led to prolonged conflict and the rise of groups like ISIS.
  • Targeting civilian infrastructure, like power plants, makes the US less safe by violating international law and opening the door for adversaries to use similar tactics against the US.
  • Military personnel must uphold their oath to the Constitution by rejecting illegal orders, understanding that 'following orders' is not a sufficient defense for war crimes.
  • Hamawi's congressional campaign focuses on domestic issues like healthcare affordability, education costs, and gas prices, contrasting these needs with the 'billion dollars a day' spent on wars of choice.
  • Hamawi commits to holding ICE and other administration officials accountable for civil rights abuses against immigrant communities, advocating for legal consequences.

Insights

1Ineffectiveness of 'Negotiating with Bombs'

Dr. Hamawi, drawing from his combat experience, states that a 'bombs first' approach to negotiations is historically ineffective. He cites the 'shock and awe' campaign in Iraq, which led to a decade-long war, the destruction of government, and the eventual rise of ISIS, demonstrating that bombing does not achieve ultimate strategic goals and instead results in significant 'blood and treasure' loss.

Hamawi's direct experience as a combat trauma surgeon in Iraq and his observation of the aftermath of 'shock and awe' tactics.

2Dangers of Targeting Civilian Infrastructure

Hamawi argues that targeting civilian infrastructure, as proposed for Iran, makes the US 'less safe' and undermines its international standing. He states that such actions violate international law and set a dangerous precedent, effectively 'opening the door' for adversaries to retaliate with similar tactics. He explicitly compares it to the 'gazification' of conflict, where widespread bombing of infrastructure impacts civilians.

Comparison to Putin's tactics in Ukraine and Israel's actions in Gaza, which the US has condemned, now being considered by the US.

3Distinguishing Support for Troops from Leadership Accountability

Hamawi stresses the importance of separating support for military personnel, who are often patriotic individuals seeking opportunities, from criticism of political and military leaders. He contends that criticizing leaders who issue 'bad orders' does not undermine support for the troops themselves, who are putting their lives on the line.

Hamawi's personal experience joining the military for education and patriotism, and his observation that most service members are 'just trying to do the right thing.'

4The Imperative to Reject Illegal Orders

Both the host and Hamawi discuss the critical importance of military personnel abiding by their oaths to the Constitution and rejecting illegal orders, even if it means facing personal consequences. Hamawi references the Nuremberg trials, asserting that 'following orders is not good enough' when those orders are illegal.

Discussion of a 'nightmare scenario' involving the National Guard being turned against American people and the historical precedent of the Nuremberg trials.

5Congressional Platform: Domestic Needs vs. War Spending

As a congressional candidate, Hamawi highlights that his constituents are primarily concerned with affordability issues: healthcare costs (insurance, denied care), gas prices, and education. He contrasts these pressing domestic needs with the 'billion dollars a day' spent on 'wars that we weren't forced into that we chose to go into,' arguing for a reprioritization of national spending.

Direct feedback from constituents in New Jersey's 12th district during his campaign.

Lessons

  • Educate yourself on the real-world consequences of military actions and rhetoric, moving beyond simplistic 'shock and awe' narratives.
  • Support political candidates who prioritize accountability for military and government leaders and advocate for adherence to international law.
  • Understand the distinction between supporting military personnel and holding political leadership accountable for potentially illegal or ineffective foreign policy decisions.

Quotes

"

"It doesn't work. We've seen this in the past. We've seen it in Iraq. We've seen it in Afghanistan. Iraq was about shock and awe in the beginning. We bombed the hell out of them and then we were in there for 10 years and we came out and what we ended up was, you know, ISIS formed after that."

Dr. Adam Hamawi
"

"When we target their civilian infrastructures, when we target their hospitals, when we target, you know, things that are normally out of bounds and then they come and do the same thing for to us, you know, we've opened the door."

Dr. Adam Hamawi
"

"Criticizing Trump, criticizing, you know, Hexth and criticizing what we're doing does not undermine our support for the actual individuals who are putting their bodies, their lives on the line and really are just trying to, you know, do the right thing."

Dr. Adam Hamawi
"

"Saying that I was following orders is not good enough and at some point we will hold people to account and so I hope people think about that if it comes to that situation."

Dr. Adam Hamawi

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

MAGA Stooge Freezes After My Question on CNN
The Adam Mockler ShowApr 3, 2026

MAGA Stooge Freezes After My Question on CNN

"Adam Mockler dissects the Trump administration's claims of 'total victory' in foreign conflicts and its alleged attempts to politicize the Department of Justice, arguing these actions undermine democratic institutions and moral leadership."

US PoliticsForeign PolicyDepartment of Justice+2
HOT TOPICS | WARNING: Donald Trump's Iran War Chaos Has Hit the Point of No Return!
The Don Lemon ShowApr 1, 2026

HOT TOPICS | WARNING: Donald Trump's Iran War Chaos Has Hit the Point of No Return!

"Don Lemon delivers a scathing critique of Donald Trump's recent actions, framing them as desperate, unconstitutional attempts to consolidate power, undermine democracy, and distract from economic and foreign policy failures, all while questioning his mental stability."

Donald TrumpElection IntegrityMail-in Voting+2
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
Interviews 02Mar 30, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like

"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."

GeopoliticsMilitary StrategyUS Foreign Policy+2
SHOCK BREAKING: TRUMP PRESSER JUST MADE ME NEARLY THROW UP!
The Luke Beasley ShowMar 26, 2026

SHOCK BREAKING: TRUMP PRESSER JUST MADE ME NEARLY THROW UP!

"The host details a "nauseating" Trump cabinet meeting, dissecting his rambling, his cabinet's "pampering," and his questionable statements on war and policy, alongside a progressive Christian politician's impactful response to a death threat."

Political CommentaryCabinet MeetingsUS National Debt+2