The Megyn Kelly Show
The Megyn Kelly Show
January 26, 2026

Crucial Questions After Shooting in Minneapolis, w/ James O'Keefe, Dave Aronberg, and Andrew Branca

Quick Read

Megyn Kelly and guests dissect the fatal shooting of Alex Prey by Border Patrol in Minneapolis, exposing the organized nature of anti-ICE agitators, the legal complexities of self-defense, and the political manipulation of public perception.
Anti-ICE agitators in Minneapolis are highly organized, employing spotters, tracking vehicles, and issuing death threats to perceived opponents, operating in areas where local police have 'stood down.'
The fatal shooting of Alex Prey by Border Patrol agents is legally debated: one expert argues it was justified due to perceived threat, while another contends Prey was not an imminent danger after being subdued.
Political leaders' rhetoric and media narratives are significantly impacting public opinion on immigration enforcement, with polling showing eroding support for federal efforts despite their stated objectives.

Summary

The episode opens with Megyn Kelly's strong condemnation of Alex Prey, a 37-year-old man shot by Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis, framing him as an 'organized agitator' who actively interfered with law enforcement. She argues that individuals must submit to police and that Prey's actions, including carrying a loaded gun and engaging in a physical confrontation, put him in grave danger. Kelly proposes a dramatic response to Minneapolis's 'insurrection' against federal immigration enforcement, suggesting President Trump should withdraw all federal immigration services from Minnesota, turning it into a 'sanctuary state' for all illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to expose the consequences of their policies. James O'Keefe, an independent reporter, shares his terrifying experience in Minneapolis, describing highly organized and violent anti-ICE groups who threatened him, tracked his movements, and even confiscated a knife from his security detail. He highlights the complete absence of local law enforcement in these 'autonomous zones.' The discussion then shifts to a legal debate with Andrew Branca and Dave Aronberg regarding the justification of deadly force. Branca argues the shooting was legally justified based on the officers' reasonable perception of a deadly threat, while Aronberg contends that Prey was not an imminent threat, especially after being subdued and disarmed, and that the officers' actions were not objectively reasonable. They also discuss the potential legal implications of a reported defect in Prey's firearm that could cause uncommanded discharges.
This episode matters because it exposes the volatile intersection of immigration enforcement, civil unrest, and political narratives in a major American city. It highlights the perceived breakdown of law and order in certain areas, the challenges faced by federal agents, and the sophisticated organization of activist groups. The legal debate underscores the complexities of self-defense law for law enforcement, particularly when public perception and political agendas heavily influence the interpretation of events. Furthermore, it reveals how media narratives and political statements can shape public opinion and potentially impact the legal and political future of immigration policy and law enforcement accountability.

Takeaways

  • Alex Prey was shot by Border Patrol agents after allegedly interfering with an ICE operation, carrying a loaded gun, and engaging in a physical confrontation.
  • Megyn Kelly asserts that individuals must submit to law enforcement during arrests and that resisting creates grave danger.
  • James O'Keefe experienced organized hostility from anti-ICE groups in Minneapolis, including threats, physical harassment, and vehicle tracking, in areas where local police were absent.
  • Polling data indicates eroding public support for President Trump's immigration enforcement efforts, with a majority believing tactics have 'gone too far.'
  • Legal experts debate whether the Border Patrol's use of deadly force against Prey was 'objectively reasonable,' considering the number of officers involved and the potential for an accidental firearm discharge.
  • Minnesota Governor Tim Walls's statements, including comparing ICE to Nazis, are criticized for irresponsibility and inciting further chaos.
  • The Department of Justice faced judicial resistance in securing arrest warrants for individuals who disrupted a church service in Minneapolis, despite evidence of physical obstruction and terrorization.

Bottom Line

The 'insurrection' in Minneapolis, characterized by organized agitators and local government non-cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, creates a unique legal and operational vacuum where federal agents operate without local support, increasing the risk of violent confrontations.

So What?

This dynamic puts federal agents in extreme danger and can lead to situations like the Alex Prey shooting, exacerbating public distrust and making effective law enforcement nearly impossible. It also creates a precedent for other localities to defy federal authority.

Impact

This situation could force a re-evaluation of federal-state cooperation models in immigration enforcement, potentially leading to new legislative frameworks or executive actions that clarify jurisdictional boundaries and ensure officer safety, or conversely, further entrenching divisive 'sanctuary' policies.

The long-term legal vulnerability of federal officers involved in controversial shootings, even if initially deemed justified, is a significant concern. Minnesota could 'wait out' a presidential administration to pursue state-level murder charges, bypassing federal pardons.

So What?

This creates immense pressure on federal agents, potentially leading to hesitation in critical situations or a reluctance to engage in enforcement actions in hostile jurisdictions, undermining federal law enforcement's ability to perform its duties.

Impact

This legal loophole highlights the need for federal protections for officers acting within the scope of federal law, potentially through new legislation or Supreme Court clarification, to prevent politically motivated prosecutions that could paralyze federal agencies.

The potential for an accidental discharge from Alex Prey's Sig Sauer P320 9mm, a model with a documented history of 'uncommanded discharges,' could fundamentally alter the legal interpretation of the shooting, shifting blame from Prey's actions to a weapon defect.

So What?

If confirmed, this defect could transform the incident from a clear-cut case of resisting arrest leading to justified force into a tragic accident, complicating prosecution efforts against officers and potentially leading to civil liability for the weapon manufacturer.

Impact

This possibility underscores the critical importance of forensic investigation into firearm performance in officer-involved shootings and could lead to increased scrutiny and potential recalls of firearms with known defects, enhancing safety protocols for both law enforcement and civilians.

Lessons

  • When interacting with law enforcement, prioritize submission and compliance to de-escalate situations, as resisting arrest can lead to severe and dangerous outcomes.
  • Critically evaluate news reports and political statements, especially during controversial events, recognizing that narratives are often shaped to influence public opinion and may not reflect the full truth.
  • Understand the legal standards for use of force by law enforcement (e.g., 'reasonable perception' of threat) to better comprehend the complexities and challenges officers face in high-stress situations.

Notable Moments

Megyn Kelly's proposal to withdraw all federal immigration enforcement from Minnesota, effectively making it a 'sanctuary state' for all illegal immigrants.

This dramatic, albeit 'tongue-in-cheek,' suggestion highlights the extreme frustration with Minneapolis's resistance to federal immigration law and aims to demonstrate the potential consequences of such policies to the state's residents.

James O'Keefe's firsthand account of being threatened and tracked by highly organized anti-ICE agitators in Minneapolis, operating in areas without local police presence.

This personal testimony provides concrete evidence of the dangerous and coordinated nature of the protests, revealing a level of organization and hostility that goes beyond typical demonstrations and poses a direct threat to journalists and law enforcement.

The legal debate between Andrew Branca and Dave Aronberg on the 'objective reasonableness' of the Border Patrol agents' use of deadly force against Alex Prey.

This debate illustrates the nuanced legal standards applied to officer-involved shootings and the differing interpretations of evidence, highlighting the challenges prosecutors face in these cases and the difficulty in achieving universal agreement on justification.

Quotes

"

"If I, Megan Kelly, went to interrupt law enforcement, conducting lawful arrests and law enforcement operations with a loaded gun tucked into the back of my pants and then I engaged in a physical confrontation with them... I'd be in grave danger."

Megyn Kelly
"

"These are organized agitators who train to disrupt and in some cases hurt law enforcement. They go out there looking for confrontations that they can make go viral on their social media or that they can use as propaganda to turn people against the good guys."

Megyn Kelly
"

"I've covered the cartels operating around the southern border and beyond. But even he is struck by how organized and evil these agitators in Minneapolis are. He said they have spotters on most street corners, even 30 minutes outside of the downtown going into the suburbs. He said there's an autonomous zone being set up, like a no-go zone for law enforcement, period."

Megyn Kelly (referencing James O'Keefe)
"

"The only person responsible for the death of Alex Prey is Alex Prey."

Andrew Branca
"

"The officer's perception doesn't have to be correct. It just has to be reasonable at the time. This was a split-second decision, but the decision says it has to be objectively reasonable, not subjectively. So, was it objectively reasonable that they started shooting? Shooting 10 times in 5 seconds."

Dave Aronberg
"

"You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple. You don't have that right to break the law and incite violence."

Cash Patel
"

"He got shot because he fought the police. He fought the law and the law won."

Andrew Branca

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

LIVE: Ben Meiselas RESPONDS to BREAKING NEWS!! 2/24/2026
Legal AF PodcastFeb 24, 2026

LIVE: Ben Meiselas RESPONDS to BREAKING NEWS!! 2/24/2026

"The Midas Touch Network boycotts the official State of the Union, hosting an alternative event while exposing alleged financial grifts, DOJ cover-ups of Epstein files, and the Pentagon's push for unregulated AI mass surveillance."

Political CommentaryState of the UnionDonald Trump+2
Joe Rogan Experience #2444 - Andrew Wilson
The Joe Rogan ExperienceJan 28, 2026

Joe Rogan Experience #2444 - Andrew Wilson

"Andrew Wilson, a former robotics mechanic turned political commentator, discusses the weaponization of political narratives, the decline of societal norms, and the importance of a Christian ethical framework in navigating modern chaos."

Political CommentaryMedia BiasConspiracy Theories+2
Judge REJECTS DESPERATE Democrat STUNT As Trump Threatens To INVOKE Insurrection Act In Minneapolis!
Black Conservative PerspectiveJan 15, 2026

Judge REJECTS DESPERATE Democrat STUNT As Trump Threatens To INVOKE Insurrection Act In Minneapolis!

"A Minnesota judge rejected a Democratic lawsuit to block ICE operations, while former President Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis amid escalating protests against federal immigration enforcement, sparking debate on state vs. federal authority and de-escalation tactics."

Immigration EnforcementMinneapolis ProtestsInsurrection Act+2
‘YOU’RE A B*TCH!’: Americans EXPLODE At ICE Thugs TO THEIR FACE | The Kyle Kulinski Show
The Kyle Kulinski ShowJan 12, 2026

‘YOU’RE A B*TCH!’: Americans EXPLODE At ICE Thugs TO THEIR FACE | The Kyle Kulinski Show

"Host Kyle Kulinski presents multiple graphic videos and eyewitness accounts of alleged ICE abuses, including assaults, illegal detentions, and sexual misconduct, arguing that these actions are galvanizing widespread public resistance and exposing a growing authoritarian state."

Immigration EnforcementCivil LibertiesGovernment Overreach+2