PROVE ME WRONG: Tyler Robinson Is A Patsy.

The ATF reported they could not definitively link the bullet fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk's autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Tyler Robinson, stating the connection was 'inconclusive.' Despite this, the state intends to have the FBI conduct a 'comparative bullet lead analysis' (CBLA). Candace Owens highlights that CBLA was a forensic technique primarily used by the FBI from the 1980s until 2004, but was abandoned in 2005 due to 'flawed scientific, statistical, and interpretive validity,' having led to wrongful convictions.

Court filings indicate the ATF's inconclusive report. The filings also state the FBI is 'in the process of conducting a second comparative bullet analysis, as well as a bullet lead analysis.' Owens cites historical reports and a news clip explaining the discreditation of CBLA.

Tyler Robinson's defense team received an initial 20,000 files, but then, just two months before the preliminary hearing, they were suddenly provided with an additional 12 terabytes of data, comprising over 600,000 files. Owens argues this 'dump' is a deliberate, 'immoral strategy' by the prosecution to overwhelm the defense, preventing them from thoroughly reviewing evidence and preparing a timely response.

Court filings detail the timeline and volume of discovery provided: 'approximately 20,000 files excluding digital electronic discovery' initially, followed by 'approximately 12 terabytes of data and over 600,000 files' on March 12th, 2026, for a May 2026 hearing.

The defense has repeatedly requested the underlying forensic case files, data, and protocols for DNA and ballistics reports from the FBI and ATF, but has only received 'conclusory' summaries. Additionally, the autopsy report, completed in September 2025, was not given to the defense until November 2025, and autopsy photographs taken in September 2025 were withheld until March 2026. Owens contends this withholding prevents the defense from verifying the scientific reports or preparing expert counter-arguments.

Court filings state Mr. Robinson 'has not received the forensic case files and the data necessary to investigate...the scientific reports.' It also notes the autopsy report 'was not given to the defense until November 13th, 2025' and autopsy photographs 'were not produced the defense until March 18th, 2026.'

Owens points out that no Gunshot Residue (GSR) test was conducted on Tyler Robinson, which would indicate if he had recently fired a weapon. Furthermore, initial deployment of bomb dogs to the field where the gun was later found reportedly failed to locate the weapon, which Owens states is 'literally impossible' for a recently fired gun. These omissions suggest a lack of foundational evidence directly linking Robinson to firing the weapon.

Owens states, 'They cannot even prove that the gun was fired. Why is the media not telling you this? Where is the basic GSR test?' and 'the bomb dogs went into the field where the weapon was found... and they didn't find the weapon. That is literally impossible.'

Owens details several alleged inconsistencies and suspicious actions by individuals associated with Turning Point USA and Charlie Kirk's family. These include Tarro Farnsworth (audio-visual company owner) allegedly violating the crime scene to remove an SD card from a camera that showed no blood, and giving 'nonsensical excuses.' She also highlights Erica Kirk's alleged lie about Andrew Kolvats going 'rogue' in discussing the bullet's trajectory with a surgeon, and the family's shifting narrative about whether the bullet was found whole or fragmented.

Owens recounts Tarro Farnsworth's actions at the crime scene (02:58), his 'exceedingly nervous' phone call (04:18), and the lack of blood on the footage (05:24). She details Erica Kirk's alleged lies about the surgeon and Andrew Kolvats's 'man of steel' tweet (09:47, 10:17).