Paul Craig Roberts & Stanislav Krapivnik: The American Blockade Is OVER - Russian Attacks on Kiev
YouTube · _Oh53zWvNYY
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Israel's 'Greater Israel' agenda, aiming to incorporate parts of Lebanon, Syria, and even further, is the sole operative agenda in the Middle East.
- ❖The US government, including Congress and the President, is 'bought and paid for' by powerful lobby groups, notably Israel and the military-security complex.
- ❖An ongoing legislative process aims to integrate the US and Israeli militaries, effectively making Israel's causes, interests, and needs America's own.
- ❖Paul Craig Roberts argues that the US-Iran memorandum of understanding is a 'fraud' and 'charade,' already 'deep-sixed by Israel's unequivocal rejection of its terms.
- ❖Stanislav Krapivnik describes Israel as a 'parasite state' that cannot survive without a host, currently the US, and views its expansionism as 'insane.'
- ❖Krapivnik criticizes Russia's 'pinprick' attacks in Ukraine, advocating for systematic, overwhelming destruction of cities and logistics to force a quick victory.
- ❖Paul Craig Roberts contends that Putin's decision to conduct a 'special military operation' instead of a full war has allowed the conflict to widen, causing growing casualties and unrest in Russia.
- ❖Both speakers agree that the lack of a clear, destructive agenda from Iran and Russia against their adversaries allows Israel to continue its expansion and prolongs the Ukraine conflict.
Insights
1Israel's Unchecked Expansionist Agenda and US Complicity
Paul Craig Roberts and Stanislav Krapivnik assert that Israel operates with a clear, long-term agenda for 'Greater Israel,' which includes incorporating parts of Lebanon, Syria, and potentially other territories. They argue that this agenda is largely unopposed due to the US government's deep financial and political subservience to Israeli lobbying. Roberts highlights that Israeli war leaders have unequivocally rejected any US-Iran memorandum of understanding that would curtail their military activities in Lebanon, demonstrating their independence from US agreements. Krapivnik adds that US politicians like Tom Cotton are actively pushing for Israel's integration into US intelligence and military procurement systems, and even suggesting US payment of Israeli veteran pensions, effectively making Israel a 'parasite state' on the US.
Paul Craig Roberts states, 'The only country in the Middle East that has an agenda is Israel... Israel clearly is in the driver's seat.' (, ) He later adds, 'one of the principal sources of money is Israel because of all the billions we give them every year... come back in the form of campaign contributions to purchase our own government.' () Stanislav Krapivnik describes Israel as a 'parasite state' and notes Tom Cotton's efforts to integrate Israel into US satellite intelligence and even pay Israeli veteran pensions. (, , )
2Russia's Self-Defeating 'Special Military Operation' in Ukraine
Both Krapivnik and Roberts criticize Russia's approach to the conflict in Ukraine. Krapivnik argues for a systematic, overwhelming military strategy involving carpet bombing and complete destruction of cities and logistics, rather than the current 'pinprick' attacks. He emphasizes that the political decision to avoid such tactics, like leaving bridges on the Dnieper intact, prolongs the war. Roberts agrees, calling Putin's decision to conduct a 'special military operation' confined to Donbass instead of a full war 'stupid,' as it prevents Russia from attacking Ukraine's ability to continue fighting. This limited approach has allowed the conflict to widen, leading to increased Russian casualties, economic disruption, and growing public unrest against Putin.
Stanislav Krapivnik states, 'I wouldn't be fighting like this. I would be taking a city at a time... until there isn't a single possible target that isn't been hasn't been leveled to the foundation.' () He continues, 'The bridges on the Nipper are still there. From military standpoint, those bridges should have been gone by the summer of '22.' () Paul Craig Roberts adds, 'Putin made a decision not to fight a war. He had a special military operation confined to Donbass... This was a stupid decision.' (, ) He concludes that Putin is 'undermining himself with his own population because he refused to fight a war.' ()
3Iran's Strategic Miscalculation and Lack of a Decisive Agenda
Paul Craig Roberts contends that Iran made a 'serious mistake' by agreeing to a ceasefire and engaging in negotiations with the US, particularly regarding the memorandum of understanding. He believes Iran was on the verge of 'total victory' against Israel and the US but 'pissed away its victory' by entering discussions with parties it claims not to trust. Roberts argues that Iran, like other Arab nations, fails to perceive the existential threat posed by Israel's long-term Zionist agenda, which aims for their destruction. By seeking peace or making deals, Iran is inadvertently saving Israel at a vulnerable time and locking itself into a 'never-ending peace process' similar to what happened with the Palestinians.
Paul Craig Roberts states, 'The Iranians... made a serious mistake when they agreed to cease-fire. They were on the verge of total victory.' () He later asks, 'Why does Iran, which had total dominance on the battlefield against United States and Israel, decide to go talk to people that they say they can't trust?' () He concludes, 'All the peace discussions do is to save Israel at a time it's vulnerable.' ()
Bottom Line
The US government's integration with the Israeli military, driven by powerful lobbying, is advancing without public or congressional opposition, effectively making Israel's national interests synonymous with America's.
This suggests a profound shift in US foreign policy where national sovereignty and strategic independence are being eroded by external influence, potentially committing the US to conflicts that do not serve its own interests.
For analysts, this highlights the need to scrutinize legislative processes and financial flows related to foreign influence, as traditional checks and balances appear to be failing.
The 'Chabad crowd,' described as the religious wing of Zionism, holds an 'insane expansionism' belief that Israel must be on the brink of death from fighting to force a 'Messiah' (an earthly emperor) to conquer 'Greater Israel' and even 'Greater Khazaria' (including parts of Ukraine and Southern Russia).
This extreme ideological underpinning, if true, suggests that Israel's actions are not purely rational geopolitical moves but are driven by a messianic, apocalyptic vision that actively seeks conflict and expansion, making traditional diplomatic solutions futile.
Understanding the religious-ideological motivations of key actors can provide a deeper, albeit disturbing, framework for predicting their long-term behavior and the true nature of their objectives.
The Russian military's inability to conduct a full-scale, destructive war in Ukraine is a political decision by Putin, aimed at preserving business relations with the West for Russian oligarchs, rather than a military incapacity.
This implies that Russia's strategic objectives in Ukraine are compromised by internal economic interests, leading to a prolonged and costly conflict that undermines Russia's military prestige and public support, rather than achieving a swift victory.
This perspective suggests that external pressures on Russia should focus on disrupting the financial interests of oligarchs tied to the West, rather than solely military or diplomatic pressure, to influence Putin's strategic calculus.
Key Concepts
Parasite State
Stanislav Krapivnik describes Israel as a 'parasite state' that cannot survive without a host nation (currently the US) willing to 'die and bleed' for it. This model suggests a dependent relationship where one entity drains resources and support from another for its own survival and expansion.
Agenda-Driven vs. Reactive Strategy
Paul Craig Roberts highlights that Israel is the 'only country in the Middle East that has an agenda,' a long-term, determined plan for 'Greater Israel,' which it pursues relentlessly. In contrast, he portrays Iran and Russia as reactive, lacking a clear, destructive agenda to win, instead seeking peace or engaging in limited operations, which ultimately leads to their strategic disadvantage and prolonged conflict.
Political Capture
Paul Craig Roberts argues that the US government is 'bought and paid for' by powerful lobby groups, particularly Israel, through campaign contributions. This model suggests that the democratic process is undermined by financial influence, leading government actions to serve specific interests rather than the will of the people or broader national interests.
Lessons
- Recognize that stated diplomatic agreements, like the US-Iran memorandum, may be rendered meaningless by the unilateral actions and determined agendas of other regional powers, such as Israel.
- Critically evaluate the influence of lobby groups and financial contributions on government policy, particularly in foreign affairs, as these can override public opinion and national interests.
- Consider that military strategies, even from major powers, can be constrained by political and economic considerations, potentially leading to prolonged conflicts that defy conventional military logic.
Quotes
"The only country in the Middle East that has an agenda is Israel. And therefore Israel clearly is in the driver's seat."
"The Israelis in this case are a parasite state. Uh that's about to go from being on the skin of the US into lodging itself right beside the heart of the body."
"The United States government is bought and paid for, it's been that way for generate several generations, absolutely bought and paid for. Israel just happens to pay more than well, and that's the funny part, Israel is not even paying its own money. It's paying American money back to uh it's as a big laundry scheme back to American politicians."
"The Russian military has been steadfastly prevented from attacking the ability of Zelenskyy and his government to continue the war. It could have been a five-day war. But Putin refused."
"There no reader no leaders in the world other than the Zionists in Israel that have any concept of reality. And they have no agenda except something short-term."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Alex Krainer: US STRIKES Iran – Iran RETALIATES Against Kuwait, Bahrain & Jordan!
"Amidst escalating US-Iran conflict and Iranian retaliation against regional US allies, this episode argues that US foreign policy is deeply controlled by an 'Anglo-Zionist conspiracy' led by the Rothschild banking dynasty, prioritizing Israeli interests over American ones."
Patrick Henningsen: Hezbollah JUST Fired Back at Israel - Iran Vows to “Crush” All Attacks
"Patrick Henningsen argues that the US and Israel initiated an illegal war against Iran, driven by Trump's incompetence and Israeli influence, leading to an inevitable escalation with severe global economic repercussions."
Pepe Escobar: “Total Failure”: Trump’s Blockade Just Backfired Disastrously
"Pepe Escobar argues that the US blockade against Iran, spearheaded by Donald Trump, has utterly failed and backfired, accelerating global economic chaos and challenging US geopolitical dominance."
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."