Amb. Chas Freeman: The Era of Impunity for Israel & the US in West Asia Is OVER
YouTube · _gMBZwg4HGQ
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Iran has consistently demanded the release of frozen assets, lifting of sanctions, and an end to the war in West Asia as preconditions for any agreement.
- ❖The era of Israeli and American military impunity in West Asia is over; Iran now openly declares it will retaliate for attacks on its supported resistance elements.
- ❖Iran has adopted Israel's historical standard of 'disproportionate retaliation' as a deterrence strategy.
- ❖The US military reportedly warned Donald Trump that an invasion of Iran would result in huge American casualties and further aircraft losses, contributing to his decision to back down.
- ❖Iran's missile arsenal is largely intact (70%) and its air defenses have improved, posing a significant threat to Israel and Gulf Arab states.
- ❖Gulf Arab nations are increasingly seeking peace with Iran and considering the removal of US forces, whose bases are configured for offense against Iran, not defense of Gulf states.
- ❖Israel faces growing international isolation and declining American public support, with its military experiencing increased desertion rates and casualties in Lebanon.
- ❖There is a strong expectation that Iran will develop a nuclear weapon, a direct consequence of the war and the perceived failure of non-proliferation efforts.
- ❖A new four-party regional security coalition is forming between Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Egypt, aiming for military-industrial self-sufficiency and strategic autonomy.
Insights
1End of Impunity for US and Israel in West Asia
Ambassador Freeman asserts that the long-standing ability of Israel and the United States to conduct military operations in West Asia without fear of effective retaliation has concluded. Iran has openly declared it will retaliate for any attack on its supported resistance elements, including Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas. This shift is marked by Iran's adoption of a 'disproportionate retaliation' strategy, mirroring Israel's past actions, to establish deterrence.
Iran has now declared openly that it will retaliate for any attack on the elements of the resistance that it supports. This includes Ansaran in the Houthis in Yemen... Hezbollah in Lebanon... Hamas in Gaza. Israel has never respected that limitation. It has always attacked disproportionately. Iran has adopted a disproportionate retaliation system in an interest of deterrence.
2US Military Pressure Led to De-escalation with Iran
Donald Trump's decision to back down from a planned attack on Iran, specifically Karag Island, was reportedly due to strong warnings from the US military. The military conveyed that such an operation would be catastrophic, leading to huge American casualties and further losses of aircraft, as Iran's air defenses and missile capabilities have significantly improved. This internal assessment highlighted the high costs and low probability of success.
Why did Trump suddenly reverse his plan to attack Iran and he said take Kar Island? Very simple I think... the US military told him that it would be catastrophic to do what he proposed to do. there would be huge American casualties in any infantry operation in Karag Island or elsewhere in Iran. The United States has already lost some 40 aircraft apparently in this war without achieving anything.
3Gulf Arab States Re-evaluating US Presence and Seeking Peace with Iran
The Gulf Arab states are increasingly disillusioned with the US military presence, recognizing that American forces cannot protect them from Iranian retaliation and are primarily configured to attack Iran. Faced with the choice of making peace with Iran or risking the destruction of their oil and gas facilities, they are clandestinely engaging with Iran about the post-war situation and considering the removal of US bases.
The Gulf Arabs are now faced with a nasty choice. They can make their peace with Iran and they in order to do that they have to remove American forces from their territory. those forces can't protect them and that's now known to them and they're not even configured to protect those countries. They are protect configured to attack Iran.
4Israel's Growing Isolation and Internal Challenges
Israel is experiencing a collapse of international support and declining American public support, except among a small segment of 'diehard fanatics.' The Israeli military is also facing internal issues, including increasing desertion rates and daily casualties in Lebanon. This combination of external isolation and internal strain creates an existential challenge for Israel, which Ambassador Freeman argues needs to make peace with its neighbors.
We've seen the utter collapse of international support for Israel and the collapse of American public support for Israel except among diehard fanatics... the Israeli military fall apart with increasing desertion rates, people not reporting for duty when they're called up and taking about 10 casualties a day in Lebanon.
5Emergence of a New Regional Security Architecture
A significant geopolitical shift is underway with the formation of a four-party core coalition comprising Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Egypt. This bloc aims for military-industrial self-sufficiency and strategic autonomy, intending to keep external great powers (Chinese, Russians, Americans, Europeans) out of the region. This coalition is developing its own defense capabilities and conducting joint exercises, clearly signaling a new alignment against perceived threats, primarily Israel.
We're seeing the development of a four-party core coalition to deal with the reality of Israel's constant aggression... This four-party Turkish, Saudi, Pakistani, Egyptian coalition will be the core of a new security architecture in the region.
6Iran's Nuclear Ambitions Intensified by Conflict
The war has fundamentally altered the nuclear issue, with the group within Iran that opposed the development of weapons of mass destruction reportedly eliminated. Successors appear to favor a nuclear deterrent, and Ambassador Freeman confidently expects Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The only potential restraint is Iran's realism regarding a regional nuclear arms race, which would make it less secure.
The group around the Ali who opposed the development of weapons of mass destruction was murdered. And the successors appear to be in favor of a nuclear deterrent. Iran may actually have one... I confidently expect Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, which I don't think is a good thing.
Bottom Line
The US military's reported refusal to execute Trump's attack order due to resource and casualty concerns indicates a potential erosion of political control over military action when faced with high-stakes, potentially catastrophic outcomes.
This suggests a growing internal check on executive power in military engagements, especially after prolonged conflicts, and could influence future presidential decisions on intervention.
Analysts should monitor for further signs of military leadership asserting greater autonomy or caution in advising political leaders on intervention, particularly in scenarios involving peer or near-peer adversaries.
The 'anti-semitism' charge, historically used to deflect criticism of Israel, has lost its 'sting' due to the perceived actions of Zionists against ordinary human beings.
This marks a significant shift in public discourse, potentially enabling more open and critical international discussion of Israeli policies without immediate recourse to accusations of anti-semitism, impacting diplomatic leverage.
Organizations and governments advocating for Palestinian rights or critical of Israeli policies may find increased international receptiveness and reduced reputational risk in their advocacy efforts.
Key Concepts
Disproportionate Retaliation as Deterrence
Iran has adopted a military doctrine mirroring Israel's historical approach, responding to attacks with significantly greater force to deter future aggression, thereby ending the previous era of impunity for its adversaries.
Inertia in Geopolitics
Political support for long-standing policies, such as US backing of Israel, can persist due to historical momentum and established interests, even when evidence suggests these policies are becoming self-destructive or unpopular, as seen with 'elderly Republicans' supporting Israel.
Strategic Autonomy
Regional powers are increasingly seeking to reduce reliance on external great powers (US, China, Russia) for security and defense, instead forming intra-regional alliances and developing indigenous military-industrial capabilities to manage their own security architecture.
Lessons
- Re-evaluate geopolitical risk assessments for West Asia, acknowledging the end of US-Israeli military impunity and the rise of Iran's retaliatory capabilities.
- Monitor the formation and activities of the new four-party regional security coalition (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt) as a key indicator of shifting power dynamics and potential investment opportunities in regional self-sufficiency.
- Prepare for the increased likelihood of Iran developing a nuclear weapon, and analyze its implications for regional stability, nuclear proliferation, and global energy markets.
Notable Moments
Iran's foreign minister announces the Islamabad memorandum of understanding is 'never been closer' to finalization, suggesting progress in US-Iran negotiations.
This is presented as the first time Iran has made such a hopeful statement, indicating a potential de-escalation or agreement, despite past 'fantasy foreign policy' claims.
Donald Trump's sudden reversal on attacking Iran, despite previously threatening to invade Karag Island.
This reversal is attributed to the US military's assessment of catastrophic casualties and resource limitations, highlighting internal military resistance to high-risk operations.
Saudi Arabia reportedly banned Israel from using its airspace for attacks against Iran.
This signifies a critical shift in regional alliances and a weakening of Israeli operational freedom, demonstrating Gulf Arab states' increasing independence from US-Israeli alignment.
Quotes
"Basically West Asia has been an Israeli and American military playground in which Israel and the United States but mostly Israel could do whatever it wanted because it had a qualitative edge militarily and was backed by the United States. So it could bomb its neighbors, it could murder people, conduct massacres in Lebanon and so forth with no fear of being of retaliation, effective retaliation. But that era is over."
"Israel has never respected that limitation. It has always attacked disproportionately. In other words, trying to do much more damage to those who attacked it than it itself suffered. But that too is over now. Iran is has adopted a disproportionate retaliation system in an interest of deterrence."
"Israel has become a state that is unable to live at peace with anybody, whether it's the Palestinians or others, because of a paranoia that is infectious from European jewelry... But there is no place on earth that is least less safe now for Jews than Israel."
"This four-party Turkish, Saudi, Pakistani, Egyptian coalition will be the core of a new security architecture in the region."
"As long as Israel controls American policy, it won't be. I come back to the point that Israel now faces very difficult decisions which Israel cats clearly sees and doesn't want to have to make. Israel needs to learn to live at peace. Israel needs to discover diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy is an oxymoron. There is no such thing. There's only coercion."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Seyed M. Marandi: US Blockade on Iran Just Triggered Iran’s HARSHEST Response Yet
"An Iranian professor details how US demands and an imposed blockade triggered Iran's harshest response, exposing American strategic missteps and the vulnerability of Gulf Arab states."
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."
Robby Soave GOES OFF On ANNOYING Liberal Black Woman Making Emotional Trump Deranged Arguments!
"The host dissects a heated foreign policy debate, arguing that 'left-wing' emotionalism and 'Trump derangement' prevent a rational understanding of US sanction strategies against Cuba and Iran."
BREAKING: Israel BOMBS Major Iran Gas Site; Top Mullah ELIMINATED; Iran Vows VENGEACE | TBN Israel
"Israel and the United States have escalated their 'Roaring Lion War' against Iran, striking its largest gas facilities, eliminating key intelligence and military figures, and disrupting missile production, while Iran threatens a broader energy war in the Gulf."