Iran To Inflict MAXIMUM PAIN On Israel, US
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Iran has consistently rejected ceasefire negotiations, viewing US overtures as disingenuous attempts to halt their counter-offensive.
- ❖Iran's military strategy is based on asymmetric warfare, aiming to elevate costs for stronger adversaries rather than achieving conventional military victory.
- ❖The US and Israel dramatically underestimated Iran's will to fight, its weapons capacity, and the resilience of its command structure.
- ❖Iran implemented a 'mosaic defense system' to decentralize command and pre-authorize targets, ensuring continuity of attacks even under decapitation strikes.
- ❖Iran has tactically shifted its focus, reducing strikes on most Gulf states (except Bahrain) to concentrate on Israel and asserting control over the Strait of Hormuz.
- ❖Gulf states, initially aligned with US/Israel, are now engaging in backdoor diplomacy with Iran due to the unexpected ferocity of Iranian attacks and perceived US abandonment.
- ❖Iran's ultimate objective is to establish a clear, long-term deterrent against future US/Israeli aggression by making the current conflict economically and socially painful for ordinary Americans and regional allies.
Insights
1Iran Rejects Ceasefire Overtures
Iranian officials have consistently rejected periodic outreach from third countries regarding a resumption of negotiations or a ceasefire. They perceive US claims of Iranian desperation to talk as false, instead viewing the US as the party seeking engagement through intermediaries.
My understanding from speaking to senior Iranian officials is that there have been periodic periods of outreach from third countries to Iran asking about the possibility of a resumption of negotiations and the Iranians have rejected those. Iran is saying that's a total lie. It seems to be the United States that through intermediaries is trying to gauge Iran's interest.
2Asymmetric Warfare as Iran's Core Strategy
Iran's strategy is not to achieve conventional military victory against the superior US/Israeli forces, but to elevate the costs of conflict to such a degree that the stronger attacking party decides it is no longer worth it. This involves inflicting damage to deter future aggression.
For the less powerful military force to achieve quote unquote victory, they don't have to win militarily. They have to elevate the costs to such a degree that the stronger attacking party decides that it's not worth it anymore.
3US/Israel Underestimated Iran's Capacity and Resolve
The US and Israel dramatically underestimated Iran's will to fight, overestimated the potential for domestic uprising, and misjudged Iran's weapons capacity. This led to a miscalculation of Iran's ability to sustain and escalate the conflict.
They dramatically underestimated Iran's will to fight, overestimated the potential for a domestic uprising, and dramatically underestimated Iran's weapons capacity.
4Iran's Resilient 'Mosaic Defense System'
Anticipating decapitation strikes, Iran developed a decentralized 'mosaic defense system.' This pre-delegated authority down the chain of command to launch attacks on pre-determined targets, ensuring that initial responses were on 'autopilot' even if top leadership was targeted.
They created what they called a mosaic defense system. So in advance of the United States attacking... Iran did was they started to delegate further down the chain of command authority to launch attacks and they had a predetermined bank of targets... in those first 72 hours or so... things were essentially on autopilot.
5Tactical Shift: Focus on Israel and Strait of Hormuz
Iran has strategically reduced the number and volume of strikes against most Persian Gulf states, believing they have 'softened' US defenses there. The focus has shifted to intensifying attacks on Israel and restricting traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran weighs tactical shift in purging Gulf strikes while intensifying attacks on Israel... a pretty substantial decrease though in the number and volume of strikes that have been unleashed against the Persian Gulf. They're going to require the US to replenish its interceptors... folks focused more on pummeling Israel and on restricting traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
6Gulf States' Backdoor Diplomacy and Fury at US Boasting
Despite public alignment with the US, Gulf states are engaging in backdoor diplomacy with Iran. Statements by US officials like Pete Hegseth, boasting about Gulf countries granting access and overflight rights, caused 'fury' among Gulf officials who had explicitly denied such permissions.
There is I understand backdoor diplomacy going on between these Gulf countries and Iran. Pete Hegsat said something yesterday that I've heard from officials in some of these Gulf countries just caused, you know, fury, which is he said that Gulf countries, far from running away from this, are now going on the offensive. This was the total opposite of the messaging coming from the Gulf.
7Iran's Deterrence Goal: Make Conflict Miserable for Americans
Iran's ultimate objective is to send a clear message to the region and to ordinary Americans: engaging in conflict with Iran will make 'everything miserable and more expensive for you.' This aims to create domestic pressure in the US to prevent future military actions.
The Iranians are obsessed with this idea. We will not allow them to think that they can end this without a clear guarantee that they don't believe they can keep doing this every 4 months. And the only way the Iranians believe they can do that is by sending a message to the region and to Americans, ordinary Americans, that when you do this, everything becomes miserable and more expensive for you.
Key Concepts
Asymmetric Warfare
A military strategy where a weaker force leverages unconventional tactics, terrain, and political will to inflict disproportionate costs on a stronger adversary, making the conflict unsustainable for the more powerful side without achieving direct military victory.
Mosaic Defense System
A decentralized command and control structure adopted by Iran, where authority to launch pre-determined attacks is delegated down the chain of command, ensuring operational continuity even if top leadership is incapacitated by decapitation strikes.
Lessons
- When assessing geopolitical conflicts, prioritize understanding the adversary's stated long-term goals and strategic doctrine, rather than relying solely on conventional military analysis.
- Recognize that 'victory' in asymmetric warfare is often defined by the weaker party's ability to impose unsustainable costs, not by direct military defeat of the stronger power.
- Be skeptical of official government narratives regarding an adversary's capabilities or willingness to negotiate, as these can be influenced by political objectives or intelligence miscalculations.
Iran's Asymmetric Deterrence Playbook
Reject all ceasefire overtures that do not include long-term international guarantees against future attacks.
Employ a 'mosaic defense system' to ensure decentralized command and continuity of offensive operations, even under decapitation strikes.
Focus on inflicting economic and social pain on the stronger adversary and its allies, making the conflict unsustainable through elevated costs rather than direct military confrontation.
Shift tactical focus to high-impact targets (e.g., Israel, critical shipping lanes) while strategically reducing pressure on less critical fronts (e.g., most Gulf states).
Leverage public relations and information warfare to highlight the adversary's miscalculations and the domestic impact of the conflict, fostering internal dissent against continued engagement.
Quotes
"For the less powerful military force to achieve quote unquote victory, they don't have to win militarily. They have to elevate the costs to such a degree that the stronger attacking party decides that it's not worth it anymore."
"They dramatically underestimated Iran's will to fight, overestimated the potential for a domestic uprising, and dramatically underestimated Iran's weapons capacity."
"The Iranians are obsessed with this idea. We will not allow them to think that they can end this without a clear guarantee that they don't believe they can keep doing this every 4 months. And the only way the Iranians believe they can do that is by sending a message to the region and to Americans, ordinary Americans, that when you do this, everything becomes miserable and more expensive for you."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."
Col. Jacques Baud: Middle East on Fire — Is This the Start of Something Bigger?
"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the escalating conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran, arguing that Western misunderstanding of Iranian culture and strategic duplicity have forced Iran into a position of necessary escalation, ultimately degrading the West's own strategic posture."
PBS News Hour full episode, March 24, 2026
"A multi-front global conflict, domestic policy battles, and environmental crises are reshaping geopolitics, urban landscapes, and economic stability, demanding urgent reevaluation of policy and infrastructure."
Bibi DEMANDS Ground Troops As Marines Rushed to Iran
"Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing for US ground troops in Iran, framing air strikes as insufficient, while the US rushes Marines to the region and struggles to secure the Strait of Hormuz against surprisingly capable Iranian defenses."