The Don Lemon Show
The Don Lemon Show
February 18, 2026

Lemon LIVE at 5 | Are We On The Brink Of War With Iran?!

Quick Read

Don Lemon and guests dissect the alarming military buildup towards Iran, questioning the Trump administration's motivations and the potential for a catastrophic, undeclared war.
The Trump administration has undertaken a historic military mobilization towards Iran, signaling an imminent, weeks-long US-Israeli campaign.
Experts express alarm over the complete lack of public and congressional debate regarding this potentially consequential military intervention.
Motivations are questioned, with guests suggesting Trump's self-interest, declining poll numbers, and a desire for 'glory' could be driving a 'wag the dog' scenario.

Summary

Don Lemon hosts a discussion on the escalating tensions between the US and Iran, highlighting a significant military mobilization by the Trump administration. Guests Miles Taylor (former DHS advisor), Dave Lawler (Axios National Security Editor), and Tom Nichols (Atlantic staff writer) analyze the situation, suggesting that a large-scale, weeks-long US-Israeli military campaign against Iran is imminent. They express concern over the lack of congressional debate, the administration's opaque objectives, and the potential for a 'wag the dog' scenario driven by President Trump's self-interest and declining poll numbers. The experts caution against underestimating Iran's retaliatory capabilities and the broader implications for regional stability, emphasizing the absence of a clear definition of success for such an operation.
The discussion exposes the critical lack of public and congressional debate surrounding a potential major US military intervention, which could have profound geopolitical and economic consequences. It highlights concerns about executive overreach in war-making and the potential for a conflict driven by domestic political calculations rather than clear national security interests. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anticipating global shifts and evaluating leadership decisions during times of international crisis.

Takeaways

  • The US has conducted one of the largest military mobilizations in decades, directing a historic force towards Iran, including two aircraft carriers, a dozen warships, hundreds of fighter jets, and air defense systems.
  • Sources suggest a potential joint US-Israeli campaign against Iran that would be broader in scope and more existential for the Iranian regime than previous operations.
  • Critics like Ben Rhodes, Jenk Ugyur, and Nick Fuentes argue there's no legal basis or congressional debate for war, with some attributing the push to 'Israel first' interests or a betrayal of 'America First' principles.
  • Miles Taylor, former DHS advisor, believes Trump's 'diplomacy first' statements are a 'head fake' for an impending strike, similar to past actions, and that Trump is terrified of the optics of a land invasion but risks losing control with air strikes.
  • Taylor asserts Trump's foreign interventions are motivated by self-interest and insults, not democracy promotion, citing Venezuela and Iran as examples, contrasting with his capitulation to China and Russia.
  • Dave Lawler of Axios confirms that scenarios presented to Trump are for a much more significant, weeks-long military operation, not just symbolic strikes.
  • Both guests and host raise the 'wag the dog' theory, suggesting the potential war could be a distraction from Trump's low approval ratings and other domestic issues.
  • There is a striking absence of robust public or congressional debate on this potential military action, with even some Democratic members of Congress reportedly unaware of its imminence.
  • Tom Nichols, Atlantic staff writer, questions the objective of such a war, suggesting Trump might seek 'glory' as a 'liberator of Iran' despite the immense risks and his previous anti-war rhetoric.

Insights

1Historic US Military Mobilization Towards Iran

The Trump administration has initiated one of the largest military mobilizations in decades, deploying significant air and naval assets towards Iran. This includes two aircraft carriers, a dozen warships, hundreds of fighter jets (F-35s, F-22s, F-16s), and multiple air defense systems, with over 150 cargo flights moving weapons and ammunition in the past 24 hours.

Don Lemon states, 'Today, the US carried out one of the largest military mobilizations of aircraft in decades, directing a historic force towards Iran.' He later details, 'Donald Trump's armada has grown to include two aircraft carriers, a dozen warships, hundreds of fighter jets, and multiple air defense systems. More than 150 US military cargo flights have moved weapons systems and ammunition to the Middle East. Just in the past 24 hours, another 50 fighter jets... headed to the region.'

2Lack of Congressional and Public Debate on Imminent War

Despite the scale of military preparations, there is a notable absence of public and congressional debate regarding a potential war with Iran. This lack of discussion is highlighted as concerning, especially given the potential for a significant, weeks-long military intervention.

Don Lemon notes, 'with the attention of Congress and the public otherwise occupied, there is little public debate about what could be the most consequential US military intervention in the Middle East in at least a decade.' Miles Taylor adds, 'this administration isn't even trying... to create the illusion that they're seeking the approval of the people's representatives to go engage in war with Iran.' Dave Lawler reiterates, 'we didn't think that there was the kind of robust public and congressional debate that you might expect ahead of something of this magnitude.'

3'Wag the Dog' Theory and Trump's Self-Interest as Motivators

Multiple guests and the host speculate that the potential military action against Iran could be a 'wag the dog' scenario, designed to distract from President Trump's declining domestic poll numbers and other controversies. Miles Taylor argues Trump's foreign policy is consistently driven by self-interest and responses to personal insults, rather than genuine concerns for democracy or human rights.

Don Lemon introduces a clip from 'Wag the Dog' and asks, 'is this a wag the dog situation... which needs the help of some sort of pageantry, whether that be war, in order to help them?' Miles Taylor states, 'What motivates him always is self-interest.' Tom Nichols adds, 'he with his approval where he's underwater on everything... he could think that this is going to solve a lot of his problems.'

4Undefined Objectives and Risk of Escalation

Experts express serious concern that the Trump administration lacks a clear, defined objective for a military operation against Iran. This ambiguity, combined with Trump's perceived erratic decision-making, raises the risk of uncontrolled escalation into a protracted conflict, potentially forcing a land invasion despite Trump's aversion to it.

Miles Taylor warns, 'You try to go do something like this and just have it be air strikes and you lose control of the situation and pretty soon you're forced to put troops in on the ground.' Tom Nichols questions, 'What is the purpose of this... what would we be trying to achieve?' Dave Lawler notes, 'There is not, in my view, a clear definition of success going into this potential operation. So, I don't actually know at what point they would decide enough is enough.'

5Iran's Retaliatory Capabilities and Threats to US Homeland

Miles Taylor highlights that the Iranian regime is not powerless and has contingency operations in place to attack the United States and its people abroad and at home if its survival is threatened. He criticizes the administration for not publicly addressing these serious threats.

Miles Taylor states, 'this regime is not totally powerless. There are very serious threats to the United States, to the United States homeland, and to American lives, livelihoods, and our way of life if we go into a fullon war with Iran. If we threaten the regime and they fundamentally view their survival at risk, they have put in place over many, many years contingency operations to attack the United States and its people abroad and here at home.'

Bottom Line

The host notes a peculiar disparity in media coverage: conservative outlets like Fox News are heavily covering the 'imminent war' narrative, while other major news channels and even some Democratic members of Congress appear less engaged or aware.

So What?

This suggests a potential strategic effort by the administration or its allies to shape public opinion and build support for military action within a specific political base, while minimizing broader scrutiny or opposition.

Impact

Analysts could investigate the correlation between specific media narratives and public sentiment shifts regarding military interventions, particularly when congressional debate is absent. Media organizations could also assess their own coverage balance on critical national security issues.

Miles Taylor reveals that during the first Trump administration, the Secretary of Defense personally advised DHS to prepare for nuclear war due to President Trump's 'bellicose rhetoric' and perceived instability, particularly concerning Kim Jong-un.

So What?

This underscores an extreme level of concern within the highest echelons of national security regarding Trump's temperament and its potential to trigger catastrophic global events, suggesting that military actions might not always be based on rational, calculated strategy.

Impact

Historians and political scientists could further examine the internal mechanisms and informal checks that were (or were not) in place to manage presidential decision-making during periods of high tension, especially when the President's stability was questioned by his own team.

Lessons

  • Monitor official statements and military movements closely, but critically assess the stated objectives against the scale of deployment and historical patterns of presidential decision-making.
  • Engage with elected representatives to demand transparent debate and congressional authorization for any potential military action, particularly given the lack of public discussion.
  • Be aware of the 'wag the dog' phenomenon, where foreign policy actions might be influenced by domestic political pressures, and question the underlying motivations behind such interventions.

Quotes

"

"The American people didn't vote for war. The American people's representatives didn't vote for war. And Donald Trump is doing the same playbook he did with Venezuela, which was something that no one felt there was any predicate for."

Miles Taylor
"

"Donald Trump has never engaged in foreign intervention because he's concerned about democracy promotion or human rights or spreading the values of a free society that America has. Never, ever, ever. What motivates him always is self-interest."

Miles Taylor
"

"The thing they're discounting is that this regime is not totally powerless. There are very serious threats to the United States, to the United States homeland, and to American lives, livelihoods, and our way of life if we go into a fullon war with Iran."

Miles Taylor
"

"When you got a lot lot of knives and forks, you got to cut something."

Tom Nichols
"

"When you go into a major conflict without a clear statement either internally to your own people or externally especially to the American public whose children are going to have to fight this war... that's a bad plan because then how do you know when you're done? How do you know what the point of this is?"

Tom Nichols

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

PBS News Hour full episode, April 10, 2026
PBS NewsHourApr 10, 2026

PBS News Hour full episode, April 10, 2026

"This episode covers high-stakes US-Iran peace talks amidst ongoing conflict, Hungary's pivotal election challenging Viktor Orban, the accelerating decline in US birth rates, AI's disruptive impact on jobs, and Palestinian Christians observing Easter under Israeli restrictions."

US-Iran relationsInternational diplomacyHungarian politics+2
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
Interviews 02Mar 30, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like

"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."

GeopoliticsMilitary StrategyUS Foreign Policy+2
Robby Soave GOES OFF On ANNOYING Liberal Black Woman Making Emotional Trump Deranged Arguments!
Black Conservative PerspectiveMar 28, 2026

Robby Soave GOES OFF On ANNOYING Liberal Black Woman Making Emotional Trump Deranged Arguments!

"The host dissects a heated foreign policy debate, arguing that 'left-wing' emotionalism and 'Trump derangement' prevent a rational understanding of US sanction strategies against Cuba and Iran."

US Foreign PolicyGeopoliticsUS-Cuba Relations+2
PBS News Hour full episode, March 24, 2026
PBS NewsHourMar 24, 2026

PBS News Hour full episode, March 24, 2026

"A multi-front global conflict, domestic policy battles, and environmental crises are reshaping geopolitics, urban landscapes, and economic stability, demanding urgent reevaluation of policy and infrastructure."

GeopoliticsAviation SafetyEconomic Policy+2