Black Democrats LOSE THEIR MINDS Over Republicans Establishing Charlie Kirk Day For College Campus

Two bills were introduced in Tennessee: one requiring public universities to build debate courtyards displaying historic documents and Charlie Kirk's name, and another, the 'Charlie Kirk Act,' to strengthen free speech policies, allow lawsuits for violations, and designate September 10th as 'Charlie Kirk Day.' The host states Kirk was assassinated on September 10th of last year, 2025.

We have two new bills in Tennessee that aim to change free speech rules at public universities and at the same time honor Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk was a conservative political activist who was assassinated last September during a campus appearance. The first bill on the table right now would require universities to build courtyards for debate specifically. And those courtyards would display historic documents and Charlie Kirk's name. The second bill is the Charlie Kirk Act. It would strengthen free speech policies and allow lawsuits if somebody's rights are violated. This is a bill that would designate September 10th on our state calendar as Charlie Kirk Day. As all of you know, Charlie Kirk was tragically assassinated on September 10th of last year, 2025...

The host supports honoring Charlie Kirk, framing him as a symbol of free speech who was assassinated for his views. He argues that Kirk made a positive impact on society and that his honor serves as a reminder that individuals should not be killed for their speech.

I personally don't have a problem with this, okay? I feel as if Charlie Kirk being honored is appropriate. I think that he was killed because of his free speech, and I think it's important to remind people that you should not be killed because of your free speech in this country, right? That is part of what makes this country a great country is the fact that we do have freedom of speech. And I think that Charlie Kirk is a symbol of freedom of speech.

Representative Jones and other Black Democrats vehemently opposed the bills, calling Kirk divisive, racist, and 'despicable.' They cited several controversial statements attributed to Kirk, including his views on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, comments about a 'moronic black woman' in customer service, the cost of gun deaths for the Second Amendment, his denigration of Martin Luther King Jr., and his quoting of Leviticus passages against gay people.

This guy did nothing special. He was very divisive. He was a racist. And we're going to sit here and we're going to take our time to honor a racist in the state of Tennessee. Kirk claimed that passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a huge mistake and that has now become an anti-white weapon. If I'm dealing with somebody in customer service who's a moronic black woman, I wonder if she's there because of her excellence or she's there because of affirmative action. Charlie Kirk decried what he described as the myth of Martin Luther King Jr. calling him an awful and not a good person. Kirk quoted a Leviticus passage calling for gay people to be stoned to death, referring to it as God's perfect law...

The host countered that Kirk was a unifying figure who encouraged robust, civil debate among those with contrary opinions, focusing on ideas rather than personal attacks. He accused the opposing Democrats of being divisive themselves by smearing Kirk and failing to unify behind the principle that no one should be assassinated for free speech.

I think Charlie Kirk is someone who is the opposite of what I would consider to be a divisive figure because he was someone who encouraged robust civil debate among those who had contrary opinions. If you really wanted to unify, then I don't know, maybe you would support this. You would say, 'Hey, as somebody who disagree with Charlie Kirk's viewpoints, he should not have been assassinated for his viewpoints. So, therefore, I'm going to support the bill because I support freedom of speech.'

The host alleged a double standard, claiming that the same Democrats are quick to honor 'thugs, criminals, illegal immigrants, rapists, George Floyd type of individuals' regardless of their character, but vehemently oppose honoring Kirk, whom he views as a positive contributor.

But, you know, when it comes to thugs, criminals, illegal immigrants, rapists, George Floyd type of individuals, they're totally fine with statues and, you know, George Floyd being honored all over the place, even though there was nothing very honorable about that guy, right? But, they're losing their minds just over the idea that, 'Hey, you know, let's have a day to honor Charlie Kirk.'