Spain REBUKES US Iran War As Trump THREATENS EMBARGO
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖The US President threatened a complete trade embargo against Spain for refusing to allow US bases on its soil to be used for an attack on Iran.
- ❖Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez publicly defied the US, citing the negative consequences of the 2003 Iraq War as a reason to avoid similar military interventions.
- ❖European countries, initially mediators in the Iran nuclear deal, became more hostile towards Iran after its uranium enrichment and its decision to arm Russia in the Ukraine war.
- ❖Canada, represented by Mark Carney, expressed support for preventing Iran's nuclear weapons but criticized the US and Israel for acting without UN consultation.
- ❖The 'realpolitik' perspective on the US right views international law as a pretext to undermine US hegemony, justifying unilateral actions.
- ❖China's strategic interest in Iran is limited to oil imports, with no significant defense partnership or emotional investment in the Middle East.
- ❖The US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal inadvertently pushed Iran closer to Russia, leading to Iran supplying drones for the Ukraine war.
- ❖Iran's nuclear program has primarily served as leverage for economic reintegration with the West, rather than a direct pursuit of a nuclear weapon for national survival.
Insights
1US Threatens Embargo on Spain Over Iran War Refusal
The US President threatened to cut off all trade and business with Spain after the Spanish government refused to allow the United States to use its military bases for a potential attack on Iran. This decision was also linked to Spain's past non-compliance with NATO defense spending requests.
The US President stated, 'I could tomorrow stop or today even better stop everything having to do with Spain. All business having to do with Spain... We're going to cut off all trade with Spain.' He also mentioned Spain 'didn't do it' regarding paying 5% for NATO defense.
2Spain Rejects US War Posture, Citing 2003 Iraq War
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez publicly pushed back against US pressure, explicitly stating his government's opposition to military intervention in the Middle East. He drew a direct parallel to the 2003 Iraq War, framing it as a past mistake that brought 'nothing but insecurity and pain,' and vowed not to repeat violations of international law or the illusion that problems can be solved with bombs.
Sanchez's post stated, 'In 2003, a few irresponsible leaders dragged us into an illegal war in the Middle East that brought nothing but insecurity and pain. Our response then must be our response now. No to violations of international law. No to the illusion that we can solve the world's problems with bombs. No to repeating the mistakes of the past. No to war.'
3European Stance on Iran Shifted Due to Uranium Enrichment and Russia Ties
While European countries initially tried to preserve the 2015 Iran nuclear deal after the US withdrawal, their posture hardened significantly. This shift occurred because Iran began enriching uranium beyond deal limits (up to 60%) and, critically, started arming Russia with Shahed drones for the war in Ukraine, radicalizing European views towards openly discussing regime change.
The guest explained, 'When the Trump reneged on the deal and he reimposed the sanctions, the Iranians stopped completely complying with the deal. They started to enrich uranium beyond the limits... up to 60% enrichment.' He added, 'When the Ukraine war broke out, the Iranians started arming Russia in Ukraine... that relationship really radicalized the Europeans... they openly talk about regime change in Iran.'
4China's Limited Strategic Interest in Iran
Despite some claims, China does not have a deep strategic partnership with Iran. While China is a major buyer of Iranian oil (around 90% of Iran's crude exports), this constitutes only 10-12% of China's total oil imports and is a fungible resource. China lacks historic trust, defense cooperation, or significant material aid to Iran, prioritizing deeper economic ties with Gulf States.
The guest stated, 'The Chinese government does not have huge trade ties with Iran. It's quite limited and lopsided... The one thing they do trade is oil... it's only about 10 to 12% of China's imports. So it's much more important to the Iranians than it's the Chinese.' He added, 'They don't have a defense partnership. They don't have a defense cooperation. They don't sell Iran advanced weapons.'
5Iran's Nuclear Program as Economic Leverage, Not Survival Tool
The Iranian nuclear program has historically been used as a bargaining chip to negotiate economic reintegration with the West, rather than a direct path to developing a nuclear weapon for national survival or domestic energy needs. This 'lukewarm' approach, in contrast to countries like North Korea or Pakistan, is framed as a strategic error leading to a disastrous outcome.
The guest asserted, 'The Iranian nuclear program has never been used as a tool of ensuring Iranian national survival by developing a weapon... The number one reason for the Iranian nuclear program has been as leverage to negotiate their economic reintegration with the West.' He contrasted this with Pakistan's 'run for it at any cost' approach.
Lessons
- Recognize how unilateral foreign policy decisions, such as withdrawing from international agreements, can destabilize regions and inadvertently push adversaries closer together (e.g., US withdrawal from JCPOA leading to Iran-Russia drone cooperation).
- Understand that historical events, like the Iraq War, significantly influence the foreign policy decisions and willingness of allied nations to support military interventions, even decades later.
- Evaluate the true strategic depth of international partnerships; not all economic ties translate into defense alliances or political solidarity, as seen with China's relationship with Iran.
Quotes
"I could tomorrow stop or today even better stop everything having to do with Spain. All business having to do with Spain have the right to stop it embargos do anything I want with it and we may do that with Spain."
"In 2003, a few irresponsible leaders dragged us into an illegal war in the Middle East that brought nothing but insecurity and pain. Our response then must be our response now. No to violations of international law. No to the illusion that we can solve the world's problems with bombs. No to repeating the mistakes of the past. No to war."
"The number one reason for the Iranian nuclear program has been as leverage to negotiate their economic reintegration with the West."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Andrei Martyanov: IT’S OVER: The U.S. Just LOST to Iran… Here’s Why
"Andrei Martyanov declares the US has lost the war against Iran, detailing a catastrophic decline in American military capability and a dramatic shift in Middle Eastern power dynamics, signaling the end of the petrodollar era."
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."
Strait of Hormuz Update 15 March 2026 | Update on Other Maritime Stories | US Destroyers Sail Again
"Despite the Strait of Hormuz being critically unsafe for international shipping due to Iranian interference, the US strategy of sequential action is failing, allowing Iran to control vital choke points while its own oil flows freely."
Economist Jeffrey Sachs: U.S.-Israeli "War of Choice," Assault on U.N. Charter Could Lead to WWIII
"Jeffrey Sachs argues that current U.S.-Israeli actions against Iran constitute a 'war of blatant aggression' and a 'war of choice' that flagrantly violates the UN Charter, pushing the world towards a potential World War III and economic calamity."