BREAKING: Trump makes DANGEROUS public threat
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Donald Trump's claims about the Insurrection Act's historical usage are factually incorrect; only 15 presidents have invoked it, not 48%, and George H.W. Bush used it twice, not 28 times.
- ❖The Insurrection Act can only be invoked under three specific conditions: a state's request, a state's deprivation of civil rights or violation of federal court orders, or overwhelming domestic violence preventing law enforcement.
- ❖Legal experts anticipate immediate court challenges to any unlawful invocation of the Insurrection Act by Trump, citing previous judicial rulings against his attempts to deploy federal agents.
- ❖The 'presumption of regularity' typically afforded to the Department of Justice has been eroded by the Trump administration's conduct, potentially making courts less deferential.
- ❖Citizens can proactively counter potential abuses by recording federal agent misconduct on cell phones as evidence, and states should file affirmative lawsuits against the administration's unconstitutional actions.
Insights
1Trump's Misrepresentation of Insurrection Act History
Donald Trump inaccurately states that 48% of U.S. presidents have invoked the Insurrection Act and that George H.W. Bush used it 28 times. In reality, only 15 presidents (approximately 33%) have invoked the Act, and Bush Senior used it twice: once during the Los Angeles riots following the Rodney King verdict and again in the U.S. Virgin Islands after Hurricane Hugo for looting.
Trump's statement regarding 48% and 28 times; Glenn Kirschner's correction to 15 presidents and George H.W. Bush's two invocations.
2Strict Legal Conditions for Invoking the Insurrection Act
The Insurrection Act, codified in Title 10 of the U.S. Criminal Code, outlines three specific circumstances for its invocation: 1) a state requests federal military assistance; 2) a state government deprives people of their civil rights or violates federal court orders (e.g., desegregation); or 3) there is an invasion or such domestic violence and upheaval that state laws cannot be executed, or federal law enforcement is prevented.
Glenn Kirschner details these three categories, referencing Title 10, Section 253, and historical examples like the Rodney King riots and Brown v. Board of Education.
3Judicial Precedent Against Trump's Militarization Efforts
Federal courts have previously pushed back against Trump's attempts to deploy federal agents, noting his assertions were 'untethered to the facts.' Judge Karen Imrut (Trump appointee) criticized his claims regarding Portland, Oregon, and Judge April Perry in Chicago stated Trump was 'adding fuel to a fire he started' to create chaos as a pretext for military intervention.
Quotes from Judge Karen Imrut regarding Oregon ('untethered to the facts') and Judge April Perry regarding Chicago ('adding fuel to a fire he started').
4Erosion of DOJ's 'Presumption of Regularity'
The 'presumption of regularity,' which assumes the Department of Justice acts in good faith and with supporting evidence, has been eroded by the Trump administration's behavior in court, including misrepresentations and outright falsehoods. This erosion could lead judges to be less deferential to the executive branch in future legal challenges.
Glenn Kirschner explains the presumption of regularity and states that judges have noted its erosion due to DOJ's conduct, including misrepresentations and falsehoods.
Lessons
- Record all instances of federal agent misconduct on cell phones; these videos serve as crucial evidence in future litigation to challenge unconstitutional actions.
- States should proactively file lawsuits against the Trump administration to address and halt abuses of constitutional rights, rather than waiting to react defensively.
- Monitor and document any attempts by the executive branch to deploy federal troops without meeting the strict legal conditions of the Insurrection Act, preparing for immediate legal challenge.
Defending Against Unlawful Insurrection Act Invocation
**Document Misconduct:** Citizens should actively record federal agents' actions on cell phones, ensuring videos are authentic and preserved as potential evidence for court challenges.
**State-Level Legal Offense:** State Attorneys General should initiate affirmative lawsuits against the federal administration for constitutional rights abuses, aiming to preempt or halt unlawful deployments.
**Judicial Scrutiny:** Prepare for immediate court challenges against any presidential invocation of the Insurrection Act that lacks the factual predicate or legal justification, leveraging existing dicta that supports judicial review.
Notable Moments
Glenn Kirschner corrects Trump's factual inaccuracies regarding the historical use of the Insurrection Act, providing specific numbers and examples.
This directly counters Trump's narrative, demonstrating his lack of understanding or deliberate misrepresentation of a critical legal power, which is essential for informed public discourse.
Discussion of federal judges (Karen Imrut and April Perry) previously calling out Trump's attempts to militarize streets as 'untethered to the facts' or 'adding fuel to a fire he started.'
These examples establish a precedent of judicial skepticism towards Trump's justifications for deploying federal forces, suggesting future attempts would face similar scrutiny and likely legal defeat.
Quotes
"He's itching to invoke the Insurrection Act because it would be another misuse of the military, kind of launching the military against the American people."
"Donald Trump just thinks it's him getting to flex his military muscle for any reason he sees fit."
"Donald Trump's assertions about what's going on in the streets of that was Oregon, Portland in that instance, his assertions are quote, untethered to the facts."
"It's clear his his determination is to create so much chaos with these runaway masked marauders of federal agents that he then uses that as a pretext, as an excuse to say, 'Look at all the chaos. I have to send in military troops.'"
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
SHOCK Ruling on Trump Deportation PLOT + DEBUNKED Election WARRANT?!? | It's Complicated
"The Fifth Circuit Court's controversial ruling redefines 'seeking admission' for non-citizens, potentially allowing indefinite detention for millions, while a federal search warrant for 2020 election ballots is criticized as a 'test run' for future election interference."
Judge REJECTS DESPERATE Democrat STUNT As Trump Threatens To INVOKE Insurrection Act In Minneapolis!
"A Minnesota judge rejected a Democratic lawsuit to block ICE operations, while former President Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis amid escalating protests against federal immigration enforcement, sparking debate on state vs. federal authority and de-escalation tactics."
Major SCOTUS "Birthright Citizenship" Case, and Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Bullet Questions
"Megyn Kelly and legal experts dissect the Supreme Court's oral arguments on birthright citizenship and break down new, potentially exculpatory evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder trial, including an 'inconclusive' bullet match and complex DNA findings."
100 Percent LEGAL Plan To Stop Paying Income Taxes! w/ Peymon Mottahedeh
"A self-proclaimed legal expert details a seven-step plan to legally stop paying federal income taxes, asserting that over 99% of Americans are not required to pay them."