Bulwark Takes
Bulwark Takes
March 14, 2026

Trump’s DOJ Made an Embarrassing Legal U-Turn (w/ Andrew Weissmann) | Illegal News

YouTube · imiXxIlhsus

Quick Read

Andrew Weissmann and Sarah Longwell dissect the Trump DOJ's chaotic legal maneuvers, including a retracted dismissal of lawsuits against law firms, a controversial proposed rule to shield DOJ attorneys from state ethics probes, and a federal judge's finding of racial profiling by ICE in Minnesota.
DOJ's U-turn on law firm lawsuits signals political interference in legal strategy.
A proposed DOJ rule seeks to preempt state bar ethics investigations, creating a 'kill switch' for accountability.
A Trump-appointed judge found ICE engaged in a 'pattern and practice' of racial profiling in Minnesota.

Summary

Andrew Weissmann and Sarah Longwell discuss three significant legal and political developments. First, the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) made an unprecedented U-turn by withdrawing and then immediately reinstating appeals in lawsuits challenging executive orders targeting law firms, including one that hired Weissmann. Second, the DOJ proposed a rule that would allow it to investigate ethics complaints against its current or former attorneys before state bar associations, effectively creating a 'kill switch' for accountability. Third, a Trump-appointed federal judge in Minnesota found that ICE engaged in a 'pattern and practice' of unconstitutional stops and arrests based on race and ethnicity during Operation Metro Surge. The hosts also critically analyze the congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, deeming it performative and lacking genuine investigative rigor, and discuss the broader communication failures of Democrats in conveying their policy positions to the public.
These events highlight the Trump administration's perceived weaponization of the DOJ against perceived political enemies and its attempts to undermine established legal and ethical accountability mechanisms. The Minnesota ICE ruling exposes systemic racial profiling within a federal agency, challenging the notion of impartial law enforcement. The hosts' critique of the Epstein investigation underscores concerns about transparency and justice for victims, while their discussion on Democratic communication strategies offers insights into effectively shaping public opinion in a fragmented media landscape.

Takeaways

  • The Trump DOJ initially withdrew appeals against lawsuits challenging executive orders targeting law firms, only to reinstate them the next morning, suggesting political pressure.
  • Andrew Weissmann was personally targeted by one of Trump's executive orders for his work on the Mueller investigation and his association with Jenner & Block.
  • The proposed DOJ rule would mandate state bar associations to suspend ethics investigations into DOJ attorneys until the DOJ completes its own internal review, effectively delaying or preventing external accountability.
  • A federal judge, appointed by Donald Trump, ruled that ICE agents in Minnesota engaged in unconstitutional stops and arrests based solely on race and ethnicity.
  • The congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein is criticized as 'farcical' and 'performative' for failing to interview key witnesses like FBI agents, prosecutors, or Epstein's staff, while calling irrelevant figures like Hillary Clinton.
  • Sarah Longwell argues that Democrats fail to effectively communicate their policy positions to 'news receivers' (those who get news algorithmically), ceding narrative dominance to Republicans who use their own media ecosystems.

Insights

1DOJ's Unprecedented U-Turn on Law Firm Lawsuits

The Trump Department of Justice initially filed a motion to withdraw appeals in four cases where federal judges struck down executive orders targeting law firms. These orders were deemed violations of the First Amendment. However, the very next morning, the DOJ reversed course and reinstated the appeals. Andrew Weissmann, whose former firm Jenner & Block was targeted, views this as a direct result of Donald Trump's intervention after seeing negative press, demonstrating a lack of consistent legal strategy and potential political interference in judicial processes.

DOJ filed a motion to withdraw appeals on Monday, then filed to withdraw that withdrawal on Tuesday morning, subsequently filing their brief on Friday. Trump reportedly claimed unawareness and threw a 'fit.'

2DOJ's Proposed Rule to Shield Attorneys from State Ethics Probes

The DOJ proposed a federal rule that would require state bar ethics investigations into current or former DOJ attorneys to be suspended while the DOJ conducts its own internal investigation first. This move is seen by the hosts as an attempt to remove a key mechanism of accountability for federal lawyers, potentially enabling cover-ups and undermining the McDade Amendment, which mandates federal attorneys adhere to state bar rules.

The proposed rule would force states to suspend investigations while DOJ investigates first. Public comment period is open until April 8th. Andrew Weissmann, a former DOJ attorney, emphasizes the importance of ethical rules for all lawyers.

3Federal Judge Finds ICE Engaged in Racial Profiling in Minnesota

A federal district judge in Minnesota, appointed by Donald Trump, found that ICE and CBP agents involved in 'Operation Metro Surge' engaged in a 'pattern and practice' of unconstitutional stops and arrests without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. The judge explicitly determined that race and ethnicity were the sole factors for these actions, violating the Fourth Amendment and demonstrating discriminatory practices against US citizens with 'foreign-sounding' names.

Three US citizens, including Mr. Hussein, were stopped and arrested by ICE/CBP without basis. The judge credited plaintiffs' testimony over federal agents, finding a pattern of racial profiling.

4Critique of the Epstein Congressional Investigation

Andrew Weissmann, with 20+ years of investigative experience, dismisses the ongoing congressional inquiry into Jeffrey Epstein as 'farcical' and 'performative.' He argues that a serious investigation would begin by interviewing FBI agents, prosecutors, and Epstein's numerous staff members who would possess firsthand knowledge, rather than focusing on high-profile, often irrelevant, figures like Hillary Clinton, while neglecting those with direct contact like Donald Trump or the victims themselves.

The committee has called Epstein's accountant and the Clintons, but not FBI agents, prosecutors, or Epstein's staff. Weissmann notes the accountant's admission of impersonating Epstein to banks as a potential leverage point not fully explored.

5Democrats' Communication Failures in the Modern Media Landscape

Sarah Longwell criticizes Democrats for their inability to effectively communicate and persuade the public on critical issues like DHS funding. She argues they are too reliant on traditional 'news seekers' and fail to engage 'news receivers' who consume information through algorithmically driven social media. Republicans, by contrast, have built a relentless media ecosystem that bypasses traditional intermediaries and directly shapes narratives, even if toxic.

Longwell contrasts Republican 'screaming and yelling' to an entire media ecosystem with Democrats' 'nervousness' and struggle to 'make the case relentlessly.' She highlights the shift from 'news seekers' to 'news receivers' and the need for Democrats to adapt.

Lessons

  • Publicly comment on the proposed DOJ rule regarding state bar ethics investigations before April 8th to voice opposition to what is perceived as an attempt to shield federal attorneys from accountability.
  • Advocate for congressional representatives to adopt a more aggressive and unified communication strategy, especially on issues like DHS funding, by clearly articulating policy positions and directly engaging voters through diverse media channels.
  • Demand greater transparency and a more rigorous, non-performative approach from congressional investigations, such as the Epstein inquiry, by insisting on interviewing key, relevant witnesses like federal agents, prosecutors, and staff members.

Quotes

"

"It is it is, you can tell I can get really triggered here. And it's and it's such a manifestation of the incompetence and cruelty that that is so manifest in so many other parts unrelated to the sort of specific legal issue that we're talking about."

Andrew Weissmann
"

"When you know the administration lies to you about everything, what we're supposed to believe them about what about about American casualties, about like, I just, I find it preposterous that anybody would think, oh, well, all the old rules that we used to have about how America does things, all none of those exist anymore, but we should still all have the same opinions about how America should behave."

Sarah Longwell
"

"The media does not need to be the intermediary between you and voters anymore. Donald Trump is communicating about waging a war on his personal janky, privately held social media."

Sarah Longwell
"

"You can be like, I want the border to be closed. It doesn't mean you shoot a nurse in Minnesota."

Andrew Weissmann
"

"This is not an investigation. Period. The end. Full stop."

Andrew Weissmann

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

Iran Attack Imminent?; ICE Widens its Terror Campaign w/ Trita Parsi | MR Live
The Majority Report w/ Sam SederJan 13, 2026

Iran Attack Imminent?; ICE Widens its Terror Campaign w/ Trita Parsi | MR Live

"This episode exposes the escalating brutality of ICE operations in the US, drawing parallels to fascist tactics, while also analyzing the complex dynamics of protests in Iran and the counterproductive nature of US intervention threats."

Iran protests
Trump DOJ REACHES NEW LOW Trying to SAVE Trump
The Intersection with Michael PopokMay 25, 2026

Trump DOJ REACHES NEW LOW Trying to SAVE Trump

"Professor Aziz Huck dissects the foundational principles of the rule of law, revealing how modern political partisanship and the Justice Department's 'weaponization fund' challenge core constitutional mechanisms and legal predictability."

Constitutional LawAmerican PoliticsJudicial System+2
The Immortal Jim Crow. 'Goon Squad' Defamation Suit. Google Race Discrimination Case. #TheBreakdown
Roland Martin UnfilteredMay 11, 2026

The Immortal Jim Crow. 'Goon Squad' Defamation Suit. Google Race Discrimination Case. #TheBreakdown

"This episode exposes the enduring grip of systemic racism through a Mississippi defamation suit, Google's racial discrimination settlement, and a deep dive into how Jim Crow's legacy still shapes Black America today."

Systemic RacismPolice BrutalityRacial Discrimination+2
LIVE: Lawyers and Fmr. Judges STRIKE BACK as Trump Threatens Courts
The Intersection with Michael PopokMay 1, 2026

LIVE: Lawyers and Fmr. Judges STRIKE BACK as Trump Threatens Courts

"Former federal and state judges, alongside leading lawyers, unite to defend the independent judiciary and the rule of law against unprecedented political attacks and the erosion of public trust."

Judicial IndependencePolitical RhetoricCivics Education+2