Piers Morgan Uncensored
Piers Morgan Uncensored
March 12, 2026

‘Trump Needs to APOLOGIZE!’ Will Iran Claim Victory Over America? | Plus Professor Jiang Interview

Quick Read

This episode dissects the escalating war with Iran, exploring its economic ramifications, political motivations, and the controversial predictions of a game theorist who foresaw the conflict and a US defeat.
Iran's victory condition is simple: regime survival and autonomy, while US/Israel face a complex, potentially unwinnable scenario.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz poses an existential threat to the global economy, risking oil prices over $200/barrel and de-industrialization.
Controversial theories suggest the war is driven by 'secret societies' with eschatological aims, aiming to dismantle the American empire.

Summary

Piers Morgan Uncensored hosts a panel discussion and an interview with Professor Jang, a game theorist, to analyze the ongoing war with Iran. The discussion covers the immediate military situation, the economic impact of the Strait of Hormuz closure, and the political fallout for the US and Israel. Guests debate the US's accountability for civilian casualties, the definition of 'victory,' and the geopolitical alignment of powers like China and Russia. Professor Jang, known for predicting Trump's presidency, the war with Iran, and a US loss, details his 'war of attrition' theory and the potential collapse of the petrodollar system. He also presents highly controversial theories about 'secret societies' and eschatological beliefs driving the conflict, which the host challenges.
The conflict in the Middle East has immediate and severe global economic consequences, particularly concerning oil prices and supply chains. This analysis provides diverse perspectives on the war's trajectory, potential outcomes, and the structural vulnerabilities of regional economies, offering critical insights for understanding geopolitical risks and their impact on global stability and markets.

Takeaways

  • The US and Israeli military might is overwhelming, but Iran's tactical war, focusing on economic damage and proxy attacks, is harder to defeat.
  • The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is causing massive damage to the global economy, with oil prices already surpassing $100/barrel and a target of $200/barrel.
  • Professor Jang predicts the US will eventually send ground forces, leading to 'another Vietnam' due to Iran's 'mountain fortress' geography and US lack of manpower/political will for a long ground war.
  • A US retreat from the Middle East could force GCC nations to pay 'ransom' to Iran, shifting the center of gravity from the petrodollar and potentially collapsing the US economy.
  • The war is unpopular in the US, with polls suggesting nearly 50% believe Trump went to war to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal or was more responsive to Benjamin Netanyahu than the American public.
  • The GCC states are structurally vulnerable, dependent on oil, desalination, and US protection, making them susceptible to Iran's tactics targeting tourism and infrastructure.
  • The host and some guests call for an apology from the US if American forces were responsible for a deadly strike on an Iranian primary school, as reported by US media.

Insights

1Iran's Victory Condition vs. US/Israel's Complexity

Iran's path to victory is straightforward: if its regime survives with autonomy, it will claim victory. For the United States and Israel, victory is far more complex, potentially leading to a 'new Iran' that is even more aggressive after a period of suppression.

Piers Morgan states: 'Victory for Iran is quite simple. If the regime survives with its autonomy, Iran will claim victory. Victory for the United States and Israel is a lot more complicated. Many roads do seem to lead to a new Iran, which is a lot like the old Iran, but even more aggressive.'

2Economic Warfare Through Strait of Hormuz Closure

Iran's strategy includes inflicting economic damage by closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 20% of the world's oil. This tactic is already driving oil prices above $100/barrel, with Iran aiming for $200/barrel, signaling a prolonged closure that could lead to global economic collapse, de-industrialization, and a shift away from the petrodollar.

Professor Jang states: 'Iran is trying to… strangle the world economy.' and 'the shumus is still closed and there are no signs that Iran is interested in peace negotiations.' He adds: '20% of the world's oil flows for the hummus.' and 'Iran says that they want to move it to $200 a barrel which signals that they want the shoo closed for months.'

3US Public Skepticism and Political Fallout for Trump

The war is highly unpopular in the United States, with a significant portion of the public believing President Trump initiated the conflict to distract from domestic issues (Epstein scandal) or due to influence from Israel (Benjamin Netanyahu), rather than for American interests. This poses a substantial political risk for Trump, potentially impacting midterm elections.

Ryan Grim cites a poll: '50% of the country believes now that Donald Trump at least in part went to war against Iran in order to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.' and '46% of likely voters said that they believed that Trump was more responsive when it came to the war in Iran to Benjamin Netanyahu than he was to the American public.' Piers Morgan adds: 'It's an unpopular war. The majority of Americans do not want America to be waging this war.'

4GCC States' Structural Vulnerability to Iranian Tactics

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) monarchies are structurally vulnerable due to their reliance on oil, desalination for water, lack of geographic defenses, demographic cohesion, and dependence on US protection. Iran's tactics, including threats to desalination plants and targeting tourism infrastructure, represent an existential threat to the GCC's business model, particularly for cities like Dubai.

Professor Jang details GCC vulnerabilities: 'built in open desert with no food security... no water security the desalination dependency no geographic defenses... no demographic cohesion... no independent security architecture reliant on the US.' He concludes: 'This is now representing an existential threat... to the business model of the GCC states.'

5The 'Esquetological' Dimension of the Conflict

Professor Jang posits that the war is driven by 'secret societies' (Freemasons, Rosicrucians, Knights Templars, Jewish organizations like Sabbatine Frankists, Jesuits) with an eschatological view, believing a Middle East war will trigger end times, the return of Jesus, the Jewish Messiah's arrival, and the building of a one-world government and a 'Greater Israel' project. He claims Christian Zionists are embedded in the US national security apparatus, viewing this as a war to 'bring back Jesus.'

Professor Jang states: 'This war is directed at American empire itself. And what people don't appreciate is the esque esquetological aspects of this war in that Iran sees um it sees a moral duty a moral imperative from God to destroy the great Satan which is the American empire.' He further explains: 'the real power base are a collection of secret societies that have an esquetological view of this war.' and 'Christian Zionists are heavily embedded in the uh national security apparatus and and in the Pentagon... this is a war to bring back Jesus.'

Bottom Line

The 'illusion of American empire's invincibility' has been shattered by the current conflict, and this perception shift is irreversible, fundamentally altering global power dynamics beyond the immediate military outcomes.

So What?

This suggests a long-term decline in US global influence and security guarantees, leading to a more multipolar and unstable world order.

Impact

Nations and businesses should prepare for a post-Pax Americana world, diversifying alliances, supply chains, and economic dependencies away from a US-centric model, and investing in regional self-sufficiency (e.g., de-industrialization, mercantilism).

The US economy is described as a 'Ponzi scheme' dependent on GCC investment in US tech stocks and startups, implying a critical vulnerability if the petrodollar system is disrupted by Iran's actions.

So What?

A shift away from the petrodollar could trigger a US economic collapse, leading to social unrest and revolution, as financing for consumer spending (e.g., 'OnlyFans') dries up.

Impact

Investors should re-evaluate exposure to US tech and startup markets, considering alternative asset classes or non-US markets. Policymakers should explore strategies to reduce reliance on foreign capital and strengthen domestic economic resilience.

Key Concepts

War of Attrition

A military strategy in which a belligerent attempts to win a war by wearing down the enemy to the point of collapse through continuous losses in personnel and materiel. Professor Jang applies this to the US-Iran conflict, suggesting Iran has the political will to outlast the US.

Sunk Cost Fallacy

The tendency to continue an endeavor once an investment in money, effort, or time has been made, even if the current costs outweigh the benefits. Professor Jang argues this will kick in if the US commits ground forces to Iran, making withdrawal difficult.

Lessons

  • Monitor global oil prices and geopolitical developments in the Middle East closely, as they directly impact energy costs and global economic stability.
  • Businesses and investors should assess and mitigate risks associated with disrupted global supply chains and potential shifts in international financial systems (e.g., petrodollar's decline).
  • Citizens should critically evaluate information and narratives surrounding international conflicts, recognizing the potential for diverse and sometimes speculative motivations behind military actions and political rhetoric.

Notable Moments

Ryan Grim's accusation of Congressman Cory Mills being an 'arms trafficker' and the subsequent heated exchange about Mills' company and financial divestment.

This exchange highlights the intense scrutiny and personal attacks that can arise in debates about military conflicts, particularly concerning potential conflicts of interest for politicians involved in defense-related industries. It also underscores the difficulty in having a fact-based discussion when personal financial interests are brought into question.

Piers Morgan's direct challenge to Professor Jang's 'secret societies' and 'bring back Jesus' theories, calling them 'fantastical baloney,' despite acknowledging Jang's accurate predictions.

This moment illustrates the tension between predictive accuracy and the credibility of underlying causal theories, especially when those theories delve into highly controversial and conspiratorial territory. It shows the host's attempt to balance acknowledging a guest's track record with maintaining journalistic skepticism.

Quotes

"

"Once the United States sends in ground forces, there's no turning back. It's all in. It'll be another Vietnam."

Professor Jang
"

"It's it's like a foreign policy, you know, made up by elementary school students. It's it's embarrassing."

Ryan Grim
"

"War is a lot different than what a lot of the public sees in video games and uh TV shows."

Robert O'Neill
"

"The US economy is a Ponzi scheme that's dependent on the GCC investing in AI in tech stocks um in uh in startups like Yuber in order to finance the uh US economy."

Professor Jang
"

"This war is directed at American empire itself. And what people don't appreciate is the esque esquetological aspects of this war in that Iran sees um it sees a moral duty a moral imperative from God to destroy the great Satan which is the American empire."

Professor Jang

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

BREAKING: U.S. Weighs INVADING Iran Oil Island; Gulf Energy Crisis Grows | TBN Israel
TBN Israel PodcastMar 20, 2026

BREAKING: U.S. Weighs INVADING Iran Oil Island; Gulf Energy Crisis Grows | TBN Israel

"As the US and Israel systematically dismantle Iran's military and leadership, the conflict escalates into an energy war, with the US considering ground invasion of Iran's critical Karag oil island to secure global oil routes."

Israel-Iran warStrait of HormuzKarag Island+2
Bibi DEMANDS Ground Troops As Marines Rushed to Iran
Breaking PointsMar 20, 2026

Bibi DEMANDS Ground Troops As Marines Rushed to Iran

"Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing for US ground troops in Iran, framing air strikes as insufficient, while the US rushes Marines to the region and struggles to secure the Strait of Hormuz against surprisingly capable Iranian defenses."

GeopoliticsStrait of HormuzMilitary Strategy+2
BREAKING: Israel BOMBS Major Iran Gas Site; Top Mullah ELIMINATED; Iran Vows VENGEACE | TBN Israel
TBN Israel PodcastMar 18, 2026

BREAKING: Israel BOMBS Major Iran Gas Site; Top Mullah ELIMINATED; Iran Vows VENGEACE | TBN Israel

"Israel and the United States have escalated their 'Roaring Lion War' against Iran, striking its largest gas facilities, eliminating key intelligence and military figures, and disrupting missile production, while Iran threatens a broader energy war in the Gulf."

Israel-Iran ConflictGeopoliticsMilitary Strategy+2
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
Interviews 02Mar 30, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like

"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."

GeopoliticsMilitary StrategyUS Foreign Policy+2