LIVE | Food Court - KitKat Heist. What's a wing?? Are Lay's Potato Chips, Potato?
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖The Buffalo Wild Wings 'boneless wings' lawsuit, initiated by a serial plaintiff, claims consumers are deceived into believing they are deboned chicken wings, not breast meat.
- ❖A federal judge initially dismissed the 'boneless wings' case with witty legal language, including a Shakespeare quote and noting the complaint 'has no meat on its bones.'
- ❖The plaintiff in the Buffalo Wild Wings case refiled with survey data, alleging 43% of Illinois consumers believed 'boneless wings' contained only wing meat, potentially pushing the case toward discovery.
- ❖Lay's Potato Chips redesigned its packaging and branding to explicitly state 'made with real potatoes' after a 2021 survey found 42% of consumers were unaware of this fact.
- ❖A real 12-ton (400,000+ bars) heist of limited-edition Formula 1 car-shaped Kit Kats occurred in Italy, with thieves posing as law enforcement.
- ❖Kit Kat responded to the heist with a viral social media campaign, including a 'stolen Kit Kat tracker' on their website, allowing consumers to check if their bar is from the stolen batch.
- ❖The host critiques frivolous lawsuits that clog courts, contrasting them with valid cases like misleading 'reef safe' sunscreen claims or severe injury cases like the McDonald's hot coffee lawsuit.
Insights
1The 'Boneless Wings' Deception Lawsuit
A plaintiff sued Buffalo Wild Wings, alleging deception because their 'boneless wings' are made from chicken breast meat, not deboned chicken wings. The plaintiff, a serial litigant with 14+ similar lawsuits, claimed confusion and economic harm, stating they would have paid less or not purchased the product if they knew the truth.
The federal judge, John J. Tharp Jr., opened his memorandum opinion with 'What's in a name? If we call a wing by any other name, would it smell as sweet?' (). He further stated the 'complaint has no meat on its bones' (). The judge initially dismissed the claim, finding a reasonable consumer would not be deceived, citing the absurdity of applying the same logic to 'cauliflower wings' (). However, the plaintiff refiled with a survey showing 43% of Illinois consumers believed the product contained only wing meat ().
2Lay's Rebrands Due to Consumer Ignorance About Potatoes
Lay's Potato Chips undertook its biggest rebranding in nearly a century, redesigning packaging and recipes. This significant change was driven by a disturbing survey finding that a large percentage of consumers did not know their potato chips were made from actual potatoes.
A 2021 survey revealed that 42% of consumers were unaware that Lay's chips were made from spuds (). The new bags prominently feature photos of potatoes and the phrase 'made with real potatoes' ().
3The 12-Ton Kit Kat Heist and Viral Marketing Response
A real-world theft of 12 metric tons (over 400,000 units) of limited-edition Formula 1 car-shaped Kit Kat bars occurred in Italy. Thieves, posing as law enforcement, intercepted a truck en route to Poland. This event quickly became a social media phenomenon, prompting Kit Kat to pivot its marketing strategy.
Kit Kat confirmed the theft of 12 tons of F1-shaped Kit Kats, valued at over 400,000 units, on March 26th (). The driver was restrained, and the truck vanished (). Nestle launched a 'stolen Kit Kat tracker' on its website, allowing consumers to check batch codes (). Numerous brands, including IKEA, PayPal, Domino's, and Denny's, engaged with the story on social media, creating memes and promotional content (, , ). Kit Kat explicitly stated the heist was 'not a stunt or an April Fool's joke' ().
4The 'Chicken of the Sea' Moment: A Pop Culture Example of Consumer Confusion
The episode references a famous pop culture moment involving Jessica Simpson and 'Chicken of the Sea' tuna to illustrate how brand names can genuinely confuse consumers, even when product labels are clear.
Jessica Simpson, on her reality show 'Newlyweds,' famously questioned whether 'Chicken of the Sea' tuna was chicken or fish, despite the can clearly stating 'tuna' (). This moment highlights the potential for misunderstanding based on brand naming conventions.
Lessons
- Scrutinize product labels and descriptions, especially for items with ambiguous names, to ensure alignment with expectations.
- Understand that legal standing for consumer harm can be established by merely claiming intent to pay less or not purchase a product if fully informed, even if actual physical harm is absent.
- Recognize that brand marketing can strategically leverage unexpected events, like product theft, into viral campaigns to maintain relevance and engage consumers.
Quotes
"What's in a name? If we call a wing by any other name, would it smell as sweet?"
"Plaintiff sued B-Dubz over his confusion, but his complaint has no meat on its bones."
"Someone really stole 12 tons of Kit Kats and we really want to know where they've gone."
"We would like to make one thing clear: whatever happened to those Kit Kats happened between 1:30 AM and 4:00 AM, and we were very busy. No further questions."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes

Trisha Paytas Is My Favorite Zionist - H3 Show #228
"H3 dissects the bizarre reality show of Trisha Paytas's Israel trip, Moses's 'water consciousness' art, and launches a $6,650 billboard campaign against James Charles, all while exploring internet culture's most outlandish moments."

LIVE COURT | NY v. Rex Heuermann - LISK Plea Hearing, Press Conferences and what happens now.
"Legal analyst Emily D. Baker breaks down the shocking plea deal of Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island Serial Killer, revealing the terms of his life sentence, his agreement to cooperate with the FBI's behavioral analysis unit, and the legal and personal implications for all involved."

LIVE | TikTok Psychic Trial, Judgment and what comes next. Plus an unexpected lawsuit.
"A TikTok creator, self-representing in a federal defamation trial, was ordered to pay $10 million for falsely accusing an Idaho professor of orchestrating murders and having an affair, setting a significant precedent for online accountability."

LIVE COURT | Dakota Mortenson v. Taylor Frankie Paul - Protective Order Hearing
"A Utah protective order hearing between reality TV personalities Taylor Frankie Paul and Dakota Mortenson reveals deep-seated domestic violence allegations, leading to a temporary supervised custody order for their child."