Bulwark Takes
Bulwark Takes
January 14, 2026

Taking Greenland Would Trigger a NATO Crisis (w/ Mark Hertling) | The Bulwark Podcast

Quick Read

Retired US Army Lieutenant General Mark Hertling dissects the geopolitical absurdities of potential US military interventions in Greenland and Iran, highlighting the erosion of alliances and the critical need for comprehensive strategic planning.
Masked ICE/CBP agents mirror corrupt Iraqi forces, eroding public trust and accountability.
A hypothetical US invasion of Greenland would violate NATO Article 4, triggering a collective defense crisis.
Effective foreign policy requires a comprehensive DIME strategy, not just military force, to avoid chaos and unintended consequences.

Summary

General Mark Hertling and host Tim Miller discuss the concerning trends in US military and foreign policy. Hertling condemns masked ICE/CBP agents, drawing parallels to corrupt Iraqi forces, and critiques the Renee Nicole Good shooting as a failure of training. He analyzes the Iran protests, emphasizing their economic roots and the inadequacy of military-only responses, advocating for a DIME (Diplomacy, Information, Military, Economic) strategy. The conversation extends to the chaotic Venezuela intervention and the 'insanity' of a hypothetical US invasion of Greenland, which would violate NATO Article 4. Hertling also provides a stark update on Russia's brutal tactics in Ukraine, the reality of Havana Syndrome as a non-lethal weapon, and debunks Trump's claims of solving international conflicts.
This episode is critical for understanding the complex interplay of domestic law enforcement, international diplomacy, and military strategy. It exposes how unilateral actions, lack of strategic foresight, and the erosion of alliances can destabilize global security, undermine democratic principles, and lead to humanitarian crises, urging a re-evaluation of US foreign policy approaches.

Takeaways

  • Masked ICE/CBP agents operate without accountability, mirroring corrupt Iraqi security forces and eroding public trust.
  • The shooting of Renee Nicole Good exemplifies a severe lack of training and judgment in security forces, contrasting sharply with military rules of engagement.
  • Iran's widespread protests are driven by economic hardship, and military strikes alone are insufficient; a comprehensive DIME (Diplomacy, Information, Military, Economic) strategy is essential.
  • The US intervention in Venezuela lacked a clear post-regime plan, leading to continued instability and corporate reluctance to engage.
  • A US invasion of Greenland, a Danish territory and NATO ally, would be an act of 'insanity' and a direct violation of NATO's Article 4, triggering a collective defense response.
  • Russia is intensifying its attack on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure with missiles and drones, creating a severe humanitarian crisis amidst diminishing international attention.
  • Havana Syndrome is confirmed as a real phenomenon caused by non-lethal weapon systems, likely from Russia's GRU, which the US military has also tested.
  • Claims of the US solving multiple international conflicts are debunked, with most situations remaining stalemated or unresolved.

Insights

1Masked Federal Agents Undermine Trust and Accountability

General Hertling critically views masked ICE and CBP agents operating without visible identification as 'thugs and cowards.' He draws a direct parallel to his experience with early Iraqi security forces, who initially wore masks due to corruption and a lack of public pride, only removing them as they gained capability and public trust. This lack of accountability for US agents is seen as counter to constitutional rights and democratic values.

Hertling's personal experience commanding US forces in Iraq (2007-2009) and observing Iraqi police evolution. Host Tim Miller cites a 30-point drop in ICE's favorability rating since Trump's inauguration.

2Renee Nicole Good Shooting: A Failure of Training and Judgment

Hertling asserts that the shooting of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis was not a split-second decision based on fear, but rather a purposeful act by an individual lacking proper training in the limited use of force. He contrasts this with the rigorous training of military personnel in combat zones, who are taught to disable vehicles before resorting to lethal force and to de-escalate situations, even in highly dangerous environments.

Hertling's experience training soldiers for combat and gate security in Iraq, where rules of engagement prioritize disabling vehicles and de-escalation. He highlights the aggressive initial approach by officers ('get out of the car') and the victim's non-threatening posture.

3Iran Protests and the Flaws of Military-First Interventions

The current widespread protests in Iran are primarily driven by economic hardship, not solely policy or religion. Hertling argues that a military-only response, such as bombing campaigns, is ineffective and dangerous given the large size of the IRGC (200,000) and Basij (600,000) forces. He stresses the necessity of a comprehensive 'DIME' strategy—Diplomacy, Information, Military, and Economic power—to achieve a desired end-state, rather than just reacting with force.

Hertling's analysis of the economic roots of the protests and the numerical strength of Iranian security forces. He points to the US removing its carrier strike group from the Arabian Gulf and Denmark's refusal to assist due to prior diplomatic insults.

4Greenland Invasion: A NATO Crisis and Strategic Absurdity

The reported request for JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command) to plan an invasion of Greenland is deemed 'insanity.' Hertling explains that JSOC is designed for specific, rapid, high-impact operations, not large-scale invasions requiring extensive logistics, land, sea, and air forces. Such an invasion of Greenland, a territory of NATO ally Denmark, would constitute an attack on a NATO member, triggering Article 4 of the NATO treaty and potentially leading to a collective defense response against the US.

Hertling's explanation of JSOC's mission vs. conventional invasion planning. He highlights Greenland's population (50,000), ice coverage (80%), and Denmark's status as a NATO ally.

5Ukraine's Humanitarian Crisis Intensifies Amidst Diminished Global Attention

Russia has shifted tactics, now systematically targeting Ukrainian substations with ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones nightly. This strategy aims to break the will of the Ukrainian people by cutting off electricity and heat in sub-zero temperatures, leading to a severe humanitarian crisis. Meanwhile, global attention and support for Ukraine have waned, and geopolitical maneuvering (e.g., Belgium being pressured on frozen assets, Macron's demands for EU-only defense purchases) further complicates aid efforts.

A direct report from an American contact in Ukraine detailing nightly substation attacks, 14-day arctic blast forecasts, bursting pipes, and civilian fear. Mention of 110 American volunteers killed.

6Havana Syndrome: A Real Non-Lethal Weapon Threat

Reports of the Defense Department testing devices believed to be responsible for Havana Syndrome are likely accurate. These incidents are attributed to 'non-lethal weapon systems' designed to incapacitate enemies for short periods using audio or other classified means. The US military has capabilities in this area, and the classified nature of such weapons explains the initial public ambiguity surrounding the syndrome.

Hertling confirms the likelihood of DoD testing and the existence of classified non-lethal weapon systems, aligning with earlier reports by Michael Weiss linking the syndrome to Russia's GRU.

Bottom Line

The US military's reliance on allies for Arctic operations is jeopardized by diplomatic insults and threats, like the proposed Greenland invasion.

So What?

Weakening these alliances forces countries like Sweden to consider developing their own nuclear weapons for defense, leading to global proliferation and increased instability.

Impact

Re-engage and strengthen Arctic alliances, investing in joint capabilities like icebreakers, to collectively secure the region without unilateral, aggressive actions.

The US government's selective use of economic sanctions, which often harm entire populations, can exacerbate the very conditions (like economic hardship in Iran) that fuel unrest.

So What?

Broad sanctions can alienate the populace, making them less likely to support external intervention and potentially strengthening hardline regimes by providing a common enemy.

Impact

Develop highly targeted economic sanctions that specifically impact regime leaders and their financial networks, while implementing humanitarian aid and information campaigns to support the struggling populace.

Lessons

  • Demand greater transparency and accountability from federal law enforcement agencies, particularly regarding the identification and conduct of agents operating in public spaces.
  • Advocate for a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach (Diplomacy, Information, Military, Economic) to international crises, moving beyond military-first solutions that often lack clear end-states.
  • Support policies that prioritize strengthening international alliances and diplomatic relations, recognizing that unilateral actions and insults undermine collective security and global stability.

Quotes

"

"These guys are wearing masks with no identification whatsoever. And they're thugs. They are thugs and I'll add to that cowards."

Mark Hertling
"

"Anyone that sees the film knows that he wasn't fearing for his life. This was a purposeful act on his part. He wanted to kill somebody."

Mark Hertling
"

"The question shouldn't be what should we hit. The question should be what end state are we trying to achieve?"

Mark Hertling
"

"Invading is a whole different thing. And and I guess there's a bill trying to get through the Senate right now that basically is the NATO protection act. The other thing that's involved here is we are attacking basically another NATO member, Denmark, and its constituency on Greenland. If that happens, we have violated what would be an article four constraint on any nation."

Mark Hertling

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
Interviews 02Mar 30, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like

"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."

GeopoliticsMilitary StrategyUS Foreign Policy+2
Bibi DEMANDS Ground Troops As Marines Rushed to Iran
Breaking PointsMar 20, 2026

Bibi DEMANDS Ground Troops As Marines Rushed to Iran

"Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing for US ground troops in Iran, framing air strikes as insufficient, while the US rushes Marines to the region and struggles to secure the Strait of Hormuz against surprisingly capable Iranian defenses."

GeopoliticsStrait of HormuzMilitary Strategy+2
BREAKING: Israel BOMBS Major Iran Gas Site; Top Mullah ELIMINATED; Iran Vows VENGEACE | TBN Israel
TBN Israel PodcastMar 18, 2026

BREAKING: Israel BOMBS Major Iran Gas Site; Top Mullah ELIMINATED; Iran Vows VENGEACE | TBN Israel

"Israel and the United States have escalated their 'Roaring Lion War' against Iran, striking its largest gas facilities, eliminating key intelligence and military figures, and disrupting missile production, while Iran threatens a broader energy war in the Gulf."

Israel-Iran ConflictGeopoliticsMilitary Strategy+2
Alex Krainer: This Military Comeback Changes Everything
Interviews 02Jan 23, 2026

Alex Krainer: This Military Comeback Changes Everything

"Alex Krainer argues that the Trump administration is systematically dismantling the post-World War II global order, creating a chaotic but potentially multipolar world, while navigating complex geopolitical pressures from factions within the US, UK, and Israel."

GeopoliticsUS Foreign PolicyIran Sanctions+2