Democracy Now
Democracy Now
March 10, 2026

"The Gulf Fears Whoever Wins This War": U.S.-Israeli War on Iran Could Destabilize Entire Region

Quick Read

Gulf nations are caught in a perilous geopolitical bind, fearing the outcomes of both an ascendant Iran and an empowered Israel, while simultaneously questioning the very US security architecture meant to protect them.
Gulf states actively distance themselves from the US-Israeli war on Iran, refusing airspace and lobbying against US involvement.
The US security architecture, once a protector, is now seen by Gulf nations as a primary cause of regional instability.
Iran has demonstrated expanded targeting capabilities against Gulf economic, diplomatic, and civilian assets, including desalination plants.

Summary

Kareem Shaheen, Middle East editor for New Lines magazine, analyzes the Gulf states' precarious position amid the US-Israeli war on Iran. He explains that Gulf nations fear both a victorious Iran, which has demonstrated an expanded targeting capability against their economic and civilian infrastructure, and a triumphant Israel, which could emerge as an unchecked regional hegemon. Shaheen details how the Gulf states, despite hosting US military bases, are actively trying to distance themselves from the conflict, having lobbied against US involvement and now viewing the American security presence as a source of instability rather than protection. He also highlights the US's denial of responsibility for strikes on civilian targets in Iran, contrasting official statements with investigative findings.
This analysis reveals the complex and often contradictory geopolitical pressures on Gulf states, demonstrating how regional conflicts can destabilize long-standing alliances and economic stability. It underscores the critical need for nuanced understanding of regional actors' motivations beyond binary 'ally' or 'enemy' classifications, especially as the US security presence is re-evaluated by its partners. The discussion also sheds light on the immediate humanitarian impact of the conflict and the challenges in verifying official narratives.

Takeaways

  • Gulf nations fear both an ascendant Iran, confident in its ability to strike regional assets, and an Israel empowered by the absence of regional rivals.
  • Iran has expanded its target list in the Gulf to include economic assets, diplomatic facilities, energy infrastructure, and desalination plants, threatening the region's 'haven' image.
  • Gulf states are publicly messaging non-involvement in the war, refusing US access to their airspace and bases for attacks on Iran.
  • Prominent Gulf figures, like UAE billionaire Kalafal Hapur, are openly questioning US authority to drag the region into war and the collateral damage.
  • The American security architecture, intended to protect Gulf countries from Iran, is now perceived by some Gulf states as the cause of current instability.
  • The Abraham Accords suffered a major setback due to the war on Gaza, making peace with Israel unpalatable for countries like Saudi Arabia.
  • The Strait of Hormuz, critical for oil transport and global internet cables, faces potential disruption, though all parties have an interest in avoiding prolonged closure.
  • The US government, particularly President Trump, has denied responsibility for strikes on civilian targets in Iran, including a girls' school and an emergency medical base, despite contradictory evidence.

Insights

1Gulf States' No-Win Scenario

Kareem Shaheen articulates that Gulf states are in a difficult position, fearing the outcome regardless of who 'wins' the conflict. If Iran survives and emerges confident, it will continue its aggressive policies, now knowing it can sway US policy and strike a wider range of targets beyond military bases, including economic, diplomatic, energy, and desalination infrastructure. If Israel and the US emerge victorious, Israel could become an unchecked regional hegemon, willing to deploy force to achieve political objectives against perceived enemies, which Gulf states do not want to replace one hegemon with another.

Shaheen states, 'whichever scenario emerges out of this, whether it's an ascendant Iran... or if it's an Israel that's empowered by the absence of any regional rivals... in either scenario, I don't think that the Gulf states will be happy with the outcome.' He details Iran's expanded target list from to and Israel's potential as a hegemon from to .

2US Security Architecture as a Source of Instability

The traditional security arrangement in the Gulf, based on US protection against Iran, is now being re-evaluated by Gulf states. They are realizing that this very architecture is contributing to the instability and war they had lobbied against. A prominent UAE billionaire's open letter to President Trump exemplifies this sentiment, questioning the US's authority to initiate conflict and the resulting collateral damage to regional countries.

Shaheen explains, 'the entire security arrangement in the Gulf was based on... the US security architecture that America was going to protect all of these Gulf countries from Iran... But the reality that they're realizing right now is that it's this American security architecture that is the cause of the instability.' He references Kalafal Hapur's letter from to and its significance as a proxy message from Gulf governments from to .

3US Denial of Civilian Casualties and Disinformation

The US government, particularly President Trump, has denied responsibility for strikes on civilian targets in Iran, including a girls' school and an emergency medical base. This denial persists despite open-source evidence and investigations by New Lines magazine contradicting official claims. The guest highlights issues with targeting protocols and the failure to protect civilians, drawing parallels to media failures during the lead-up to the Iraq War.

The host details Trump's shifting statements on the girls' school strike from to . Shaheen confirms New Lines magazine's investigations showed 'no evidence that Iran could have actually carried out the strike' on the school and described the EMT center strike as a 'clear case of bad targeting' that killed 20-30 civilians, stating, 'it's clear there are problems with the targeting protocols' from to .

Lessons

  • Analyze the long-term implications of US security alliances in the Middle East, considering how they are perceived by regional partners as both protection and a potential catalyst for conflict.
  • Monitor the messaging and actions of Gulf states for signals of shifting allegiances or independent foreign policy initiatives, particularly their efforts to distance themselves from US military actions.
  • Investigate claims of civilian casualties in conflict zones with skepticism towards official narratives, utilizing open-source intelligence and independent journalistic reports to verify facts.

Quotes

"

"Who gave you the authority to drag our region into a war with Iran and on what basis did you make this dangerous decision? Did you calculate the collateral damage before pulling the trigger? And did you consider that the first to suffer from this escalation will be the countries of the region itself?"

Kalafal Hapur (quoted by Juan Gonzalez)
"

"But the reality that they're realizing right now is that it's this American security architecture that is the cause of the instability, that is the cause of of the war that that has started and that they've lobbied so hard against."

Kareem Shaheen
"

"It's really important for the media to also avoid the same failures of the Iraq war that the political class went through, which is to take the words of people like Donald Trump who are clearly lying at face value and to just simply go with it and publish it as though it's you know it's just the other side of the story."

Kareem Shaheen

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes