Interviews 02
Interviews 02
May 13, 2026

Alastair Crooke: Iran Smashed the US Military Model – China Is Watching

YouTube · IUeHkLFFpEI

Quick Read

Alastair Crooke details how Iran's asymmetrical warfare has exposed critical flaws in the US military model, creating a geopolitical ripple effect that China and Russia are actively studying, while simultaneously triggering a severe global energy crisis and supply chain disruptions.
Iran's low-cost, high-impact tactics (speedboats, anti-ship missiles) have neutralized expensive US naval blockades.
China and Russia are actively integrating lessons from Iran's success into their own military planning, especially concerning Taiwan and European missile defense.
The conflict is triggering a severe global energy crisis and supply chain disruptions, with profound economic and political consequences for the West.

Summary

The ongoing conflict with Iran has revealed the obsolescence of the US's expensive, high-end military strategy against Iran's effective asymmetrical warfare, which utilizes cheap, widely available electronic components and swarming tactics. This shift is being closely observed by China, particularly regarding Taiwan, and by Russia, informing their own deterrence strategies. The US faces an impasse, with Iran rejecting negotiation terms and strengthening its preconditions, while internal political constraints and Israeli influence prevent a resolution. The conflict is precipitating a severe global energy crisis, supply chain collapses, and widespread economic inflation, threatening political stability in Europe and the US. Crooke argues that the US approach, driven by Trump's desire for a "win" rather than a coherent strategy, is devastating the global economy and America's reputation, potentially leading to a new Middle East security architecture excluding the US.
This analysis is critical for understanding the profound shifts in global military power, the vulnerabilities of traditional defense strategies, and the impending economic instability driven by geopolitical conflicts. It highlights how regional conflicts can trigger global economic shocks, challenge established alliances, and reshape international relations, particularly the roles of the US, China, and Russia. For businesses, it signals severe supply chain risks and energy price volatility. For policymakers, it underscores the urgent need to re-evaluate military doctrines and diplomatic approaches in an era of asymmetrical threats.

Takeaways

  • Iran's asymmetrical warfare, using inexpensive components and swarming tactics, has effectively countered the US's high-end military model in the Gulf.
  • China is studying Iran's tactics for potential application in a Taiwan scenario, particularly against US naval blockades.
  • Russia is observing Iran's graduated missile deterrence against Israel as a model for its own European defense strategy.
  • The US is at an impasse with Iran, unable to secure capitulation or provide credible guarantees against future conflict due to internal political blockades and Israeli influence.
  • The conflict is expected to cause a severe global energy shock and supply chain collapses, leading to widespread inflation and political instability in the West.
  • The US "way of war," focused on outspending adversaries with expensive weaponry, is deemed "dead as the dodo" against modern asymmetrical threats.
  • Israel's "permanent security" doctrine, aiming for military control over the Middle East, is unsustainable and leading to an internal military crisis.
  • China is unlikely to pressure Iran to capitulate, viewing Iran's sovereignty efforts positively and not being significantly impacted by the Hormuz situation.
  • US military bases in the Gulf are increasingly seen as vulnerabilities rather than protective assets by host nations.
  • The long-term outcome may involve a new Middle East security architecture led by regional states, excluding the United States.

Insights

1Iran's Asymmetrical Warfare Model Disrupts US Military Dominance

Iran has successfully employed low-cost, asymmetrical tactics, such as small speedboats and anti-ship missiles in swarms, to counter the US naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. This approach has proven highly effective against the US's traditional, expensive, high-tech military model.

The host mentions "Project Freedom" concluded after 24 hours due to Iran's leverage in the Persian Gulf. Alastair Crooke explicitly states Iran's "small speedboats and the anti-ship missiles and the very swarmlike process" against the naval blockade of Hormuz. He later explains that an Iranian intercept costs "a few hundred dollars" compared to a "Patriot missile costing 17 million dollars."

2China and Russia Adapt Lessons from Iran's Military Success

Both China and Russia are closely observing and learning from Iran's successful asymmetrical warfare strategies. China is applying these lessons to potential scenarios around Taiwan, particularly concerning managing any American naval blockade. Russia is noting Iran's graduated use of sophisticated missiles to create deterrence against Israel without escalating to all-out war, informing its own strategy against European provocations.

Crooke states, "the lessons from Iran, the lessons of its asymmetrical war are very apparent in China... Chinese looking at Taiwan surrounded by big heavy Iranian vessels haven't taken notice of the Iranian small speedboats...". He adds, "Russia too has noted how Iran's powerful graduated use of sophisticated missiles on Israel has created a deterrence."

3Impending Global Energy Crisis and Supply Chain Collapse

The ongoing conflict and blockades are on the brink of triggering a severe global energy crisis, potentially the worst since 1973, and causing widespread supply chain disruptions. Inventories of strategic reserves are critically low, and the economic impact, including inflation and unavailability of essential goods, is expected to hit Europe and America "shockingly" and "very quickly."

Crooke warns of "one of the worst energy shocks since 73", noting "gasoline or petrol... is just unavailable" in Ireland and "Australia is almost run out". He predicts "the crisis suddenly becoming real and no longer abstract but coming um and tangible and hurting people" within a week. He also mentions "supply lines will snap" leading to shortages of various goods.

4US Foreign Policy Hampered by Internal Politics and Israeli Influence

The US's ability to negotiate an end to the conflict with Iran is severely constrained. Iran demands guarantees against future war and sanction lifting, which Trump cannot credibly provide due to his past actions (planning sneak attacks during negotiations) and the structural inability of Congress to ratify such a treaty. Furthermore, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's insistence on continuing the war appears to hold significant sway over Trump's decisions, despite the economic damage to the US.

Crooke highlights Iran's demand for "a guarantee of no further war now or in the future" and questions Trump's credibility, noting he "twice hoodwinked Iran into taking part in negotiations while at the same time he was planning a sneak attack". He states that a treaty would be "structurally blockaded" by Congress and that Netanyahu "calls a shot", insisting "the war must go on."

Bottom Line

The US military's reliance on expensive, high-end weaponry and air dominance, a model developed during the Cold War, is now "dead as the dodo" against modern asymmetrical warfare.

So What?

This implies a fundamental shift in military effectiveness, where financial superiority no longer guarantees victory against adversaries employing cheap, widely available technology and innovative tactics.

Impact

Nations and defense industries should invest in developing and countering asymmetrical threats, focusing on cost-effective, decentralized, and adaptable defense strategies rather than traditional large-scale, high-cost platforms.

US military bases in the GCC countries are transforming from perceived protective assets into strategic vulnerabilities and targets for Iran.

So What?

This re-evaluation by Gulf States could lead to increased pressure for US military withdrawal, fundamentally altering regional security alliances and potentially paving the way for a new, US-excluded security architecture.

Impact

Regional powers like China and Russia can capitalize on this shift by offering alternative security frameworks and fostering closer ties with Gulf States, accelerating the decline of US influence in the Middle East.

The internal dynamics within Iran have undergone a "second wind to the revolution," leading to a more defiant and radicalized populace and leadership.

So What?

This heightened revolutionary spirit makes Iran less likely to capitulate to external pressure or accept unfavorable negotiation terms, prolonging the conflict and increasing regional instability.

Impact

Understanding this internal shift is crucial for diplomatic engagement, indicating that traditional coercive tactics are likely to be ineffective and may even backfire, further entrenching hardline positions.

Lessons

  • Monitor global energy markets and supply chain indicators closely, as significant price hikes and disruptions are anticipated "within a week" due to the Middle East conflict.
  • Re-evaluate investment strategies in defense and technology, considering the declining effectiveness of high-cost military hardware against asymmetrical warfare models.
  • Observe the evolving geopolitical landscape in the Middle East for opportunities arising from a potential shift towards a regional security architecture that excludes the United States.

Quotes

"

"Iran is essentially... a huge geopolitical event. It is going to transform almost certainly the Gulf."

Alastair Crooke
"

"the American way of war... is as dead as the dodo."

Alastair Crooke
"

"You could have an intercept made by Iran costing a few hundred dollars as opposed to a Patriot missile costing 17 million dollars and it changed the whole balance of war."

Alastair Crooke
"

"The IDF was on the verge of implosion because I put 10 red lights before you. He said, 'We can't we're going to implode if we go on like we are going. We don't have men for the tasks that are required of us.'"

Alastair Crooke (quoting the IDF Chief of Staff)

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes