LIVE: Supreme Court Makes MAJOR MOVE + BREAKING NEWS | Legal AF

A magistrate judge expressed grave concern over the treatment of Cole Allen, the alleged White House Correspondents' Dinner shooter. The judge noted Allen's restrictive solitary confinement and use of five-point restraints as unprecedented, contrasting it sharply with the treatment of January 6 defendants, and questioned the DOJ's justifications.

Magistrate Judge Farooqi stated he was 'gravely concerned' with Allen's treatment, specifically comparing his solitary confinement and restraints to the less severe conditions for January 6 defendants. The judge noted, 'Allan is being treated differently than anyone I've ever observed' and 'I have never had a January 6th defendant put in five-point restraints or in a safe cell.'

Justice Alito issued a two-sentence order pausing a Fifth Circuit ruling that would have immediately halted the 2023 FDA regulation allowing telemedicine prescriptions for the abortion pill mifepristone. This temporary stay keeps the pill accessible by mail for one week while further briefing occurs, highlighting the Supreme Court's intervention in a highly politicized medical issue.

Justice Alito issued a two-sentence order 'basically pausing this day that the fifth circuit issued about the abortion pill for Prisone.' This allowed the FDA regulation to proceed, 'allowing doctors to continue prescribing it for one week while there's briefing on the issue.'

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is accused of 'judicial activism' for issuing a stay on the 2023 FDA regulation for mifepristone, despite the FDA's ongoing review and the case not being at an appeal stage. This action is seen as an attempt by conservative judges to substitute their judgment for established medical and regulatory processes, aiming to block nationwide access to the most common form of abortion.

The Fifth Circuit 'instead of just staying the litigation... we are going to pause that FDA regulation that approved it in 2023 that's how drastic this is talk about activism judicial activism ism here trying to substitute for the FDA approval process these judges just outright saying it was illegal.'

A Supreme Court decision striking down Louisiana's redistricting, which created a second majority-minority district, has led Louisiana to consider suspending voting in that specific congressional district. This late intervention by the Supreme Court, close to an election, violates the long-standing 'Purcell principle' against disrupting ongoing elections and is seen as part of a broader agenda to undermine the Voting Rights Act.

Louisiana 'plans on suspending voting, not their entire ballot, but just that specific congressional district.' The hosts note the Supreme Court issued its opinion 'so late' and that there's a 'long-standing precedent called the PCEL precedent, which is about the court saying it's not going to intervene... in an ongoing or near election.'

Donald Trump's motion for summary judgment, arguing presidential immunity in the January 6 civil lawsuit, was denied. The judge ruled that Trump's actions, particularly his speech at the rally, were private and campaign-related, not official presidential conduct, thus allowing discovery to proceed against him, Rudy Giuliani, and extremist groups.

Trump 'lost a significant summary judgement motion where he tried to say that he was immune from this civil lawsuit. Uh the judge disagreed and allowed said that now discovery can move forward.' The judge pointed to the fact that the rally was 'paid for with yes campaign money campaign money. It was not paid for with government money.'