Democracy Now
Democracy Now
January 7, 2026

Trump's Plan to Seize Greenland Would "Militarize the Arctic," Trample Indigenous Rights

Quick Read

The Trump administration's aggressive pursuit of Greenland, including potential military force, sparks international condemnation, threatens NATO, and highlights the disregard for indigenous sovereignty and international law.
The US administration openly discussed military options to acquire Greenland, citing national security and mineral wealth.
Denmark warned that a US attack on Greenland would dismantle NATO, while Greenlandic Inuit leaders declared the island 'not for sale.'
The aggressive US stance is seen as imperialism, undermining international law and complicating critical US-Russia negotiations.

Summary

The Trump administration publicly expressed its intent to acquire Greenland, a territory controlled by Denmark for over 300 years, citing national security and access to critical mineral deposits. White House officials, including Steven Miller, suggested military force was an option, drawing parallels to the US attack on Venezuela. Danish Prime Minister Meta Frederickson warned that a US attack on Greenland, a NATO member, would dissolve the alliance. Experts like Pavle Devyatkin from the Quincy Institute argue this move is pure imperialism, based on false pretenses about Russian/Chinese threats, and undermines international law. He also connects the push to climate change, noting the militarization of the Arctic rather than cooperation. Aayou Peter, a Greenlandic Inuit activist, emphasizes that Greenland is 'not up for sale' and its people demand self-determination and inclusion in any discussions, highlighting their history of being 'twice colonized.' The episode also explores how Russia is interpreting the US actions in Venezuela, with some officials studying the operation for lessons while condemning it as state terrorism, further complicating US-Russia relations regarding Ukraine and arms control.
The US administration's explicit consideration of military force to acquire Greenland sets a dangerous precedent, challenging fundamental principles of international law and sovereignty. This move risks fracturing NATO, a cornerstone of post-WWII security, and directly threatens the self-determination and rights of the Greenlandic Inuit people. It also underscores the global scramble for Arctic resources and strategic control amidst climate change, potentially militarizing a region critical for global environmental stability. The parallel with the Venezuela attack further erodes trust in international diplomacy, particularly impacting sensitive negotiations like US-Russia arms control.

Takeaways

  • The Trump administration publicly stated its intention to acquire Greenland, considering both purchase and military options.
  • Danish Prime Minister Meta Frederickson warned that a US military attack on Greenland would lead to the collapse of NATO.
  • Greenlandic Inuit activist Aayou Peter asserted that Greenland is 'not up for sale' and its people demand self-determination and inclusion in any discussions.
  • The US push for Greenland is linked to its vast critical mineral deposits and the desire to control emerging Arctic shipping lanes.
  • Experts view the US actions as 'pure imperialism,' undermining international law and potentially militarizing the Arctic.
  • The US attack on Venezuela is seen by some Russian commentators as a blueprint for aggressive foreign policy, complicating US-Russia negotiations on Ukraine and arms control.

Insights

1US Pursues Greenland with Military Force as an Option

The Trump administration, through statements from White House press secretary Carolyn Levit and advisor Steven Miller, openly discussed acquiring Greenland, explicitly stating that 'utilizing the US military is always an option.' This approach is framed as a national security imperative, despite existing US military control via a 1951 agreement with Denmark.

White House press secretary Carolyn Levit stated, 'The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal.' Steven Miller added, 'Nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.'

2Denmark Warns of NATO Collapse if US Attacks Greenland

Danish Prime Minister Meta Frederickson issued a stark warning that a US military attack on Greenland, a NATO country, would lead to the immediate cessation of NATO operations and the security framework established since World War II. This highlights the severe strain on transatlantic alliances.

Meta Frederickson stated, 'If the United States chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops. That is including our NATO and thus the security that has been provided since the end of the Second World War.'

3Greenlandic Inuit Demand Self-Determination Amidst Colonial Threats

Aayou Peter, a Greenlandic Inuit activist, articulated the indigenous perspective that Greenland is 'not up for sale' and its people seek independence. She emphasized the historical trauma of being 'twice colonized' (by Denmark and Canada) and the imperative for indigenous voices to be central in any decisions regarding their land and future.

Aayou Peter stated, 'Greenland is not up for sale. That's what Greenland is saying. And Greenland wants its independence.' She added, 'You actually have to have a conversation with the indigenous peoples of Greenland.'

4Greenland's Mineral Wealth and Arctic Shipping Lanes Drive US Interest

The US interest in Greenland is significantly driven by its vast critical mineral deposits, with figures like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk reportedly backing extraction efforts. Additionally, the melting Arctic ice sheet is opening new shipping lanes, which the US seeks to control militarily to compete with Russia's Northern Sea Route.

Pavle Devyatkin noted, 'Trump's push to seize Greenland is also related to the island's vast critical mineral deposits. Billionaires like Peter Teal and Elon Musk are also behind the push to extract these minerals.' He also mentioned, 'Trump wants to use military control over these emerging trade corridors to compete with Russia's northern seaw route.'

5US Actions in Venezuela and Greenland Undermine International Law and US-Russia Relations

The US attack on Venezuela and the threats against Greenland are framed as 'naked imperialism' and 'state terrorism' by some Russian commentators, who see it as stripping away any American pretense of supporting international law. This aggressive posture is severely complicating US-Russia negotiations, particularly regarding Ukraine and the New START treaty.

Pavle Devyatkin reported, 'Russia's UN representative has condemned the attack on Venezuela, calling it a violation of international law, an act of state terrorism.' He added, 'These actions against Venezuela are catastrophic for any potential USRussia negotiations over Ukraine.'

Lessons

  • Monitor geopolitical shifts in the Arctic, as the region's strategic importance for resources and shipping lanes is rapidly increasing due to climate change.
  • Recognize the critical role of indigenous sovereignty and self-determination in international relations, especially concerning resource-rich territories.
  • Understand how 'might makes right' foreign policy approaches can destabilize long-standing alliances like NATO and complicate crucial diplomatic efforts, such as arms control negotiations.

Quotes

"

"The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal. And of course, utilizing the US military is always an option at the commander-in-chief's disposal."

Carolyn Levit (White House Press Secretary)
"

"If the United States chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops. That is including our NATO and thus the security that has been provided since the end of the Second World War."

Meta Frederickson (Danish Prime Minister)
"

"This is pure imperialism. Trump's claiming that Russian and Chinese ships are all along the coast of Greenland and that Denmark can't protect it. But this is false."

Pavle Devyatkin
"

"Greenland is not up for sale. That's what Greenland is saying. And Greenland wants its independence."

Aayou Peter
"

"How can Russia negotiate with an America that just demonstrated it will use military force to seize territory and overthrow governments it doesn't like?"

Pavle Devyatkin

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
Interviews 02Mar 30, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like

"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."

GeopoliticsMilitary StrategyUS Foreign Policy+2
Alex Krainer: This Military Comeback Changes Everything
Interviews 02Jan 23, 2026

Alex Krainer: This Military Comeback Changes Everything

"Alex Krainer argues that the Trump administration is systematically dismantling the post-World War II global order, creating a chaotic but potentially multipolar world, while navigating complex geopolitical pressures from factions within the US, UK, and Israel."

GeopoliticsUS Foreign PolicyIran Sanctions+2
Col. Jacques Baud: The World Is Entering a Lawless Era
Interviews 02Jan 6, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: The World Is Entering a Lawless Era

"Colonel Jacques Baud details his personal experience with arbitrary EU sanctions and argues that the world has shifted from a law-based international order to a dangerous, rules-based system dictated by powerful actors, exemplified by US actions in Venezuela and the EU's 'teenager decision-making'."

GeopoliticsInternational LawEU Sanctions+2
Robby Soave GOES OFF On ANNOYING Liberal Black Woman Making Emotional Trump Deranged Arguments!
Black Conservative PerspectiveMar 28, 2026

Robby Soave GOES OFF On ANNOYING Liberal Black Woman Making Emotional Trump Deranged Arguments!

"The host dissects a heated foreign policy debate, arguing that 'left-wing' emotionalism and 'Trump derangement' prevent a rational understanding of US sanction strategies against Cuba and Iran."

US Foreign PolicyGeopoliticsUS-Cuba Relations+2