CNN Anchor GOES SILENT As Iranian Activists TURN AGAINST Democrats And Liberals For ATTACKING Trump!

Iranian activists expressed widespread celebration following the military action against Iran's leadership, explicitly thanking Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. They framed the event as a long-awaited step towards a secular democracy, contrasting their joy with the critical stance taken by many Democrats. They conveyed a strong desire for the end of the Islamic Republic, viewing it as the 'root cause of chaos' in the region.

Rita James stated, 'Thank you, Donald Trump. Thank you, Benjamin Netanyahu. Thank you, America. It's not death to America after they killed the leader... It's thank you. It's a new day dawning.' Moj added that Iranian people have been waiting for this moment for 47 years and that targeted military action against political leaders should be pursued to end the regime.

Many Democrats and liberal commentators criticized the military action against Iran's leadership, arguing it was an unprovoked act that posed no imminent threat to the United States. They highlighted the lack of congressional authorization, the potential for a dangerous 'quagmire' overseas, and the need for the president to focus on domestic issues. They framed the action as illegal and a move towards regime change without proper justification.

An unnamed Democrat stated, 'It posed no imminent threat of attack to the United States... there was simply no basis to go in with this massive military campaign with the goal of regime change.' Another added, 'This president is intentionally tanking our economy... he is busy getting us involved in quagmires overseas that already are becoming deadly to American soldiers. This is a disaster. It is illegal.'

Senator John Fetterman, a Democrat, publicly supported the military action against Iran's leadership, criticizing his own party's opposition. He accused fellow Democrats of engaging in 'political theater' and prioritizing their dislike of former President Trump over national security and the opportunity to dismantle a dangerous regime. Fetterman emphasized that the world is 'better' with the Iranian leadership eliminated and that Democrats should prioritize 'country over party.'

John Fetterman stated, 'I'm tired of seeing people... saying we can never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb... but when President Trump was willing to do the kinds of things that are necessary to provide those things... I'm going to support that as a Democrat. I know that's absolutely the right thing to do.' He later added, 'I don't give a damn about what the base wants... I am going to stand with the president when it comes to this situation.'

Some voices, including Iranian activists and a Democrat, argued that the complete dismantling of the Islamic Republic is a non-negotiable imperative for global security, not just for the Iranian people. They contended that ending the regime would have far-reaching positive impacts on the Middle East, Venezuela, China, and Ukraine, comparing it to the fall of the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall as a 'transformational moment for humankind.'

Moj stated, 'If we want to reduce the risk, if we want to endless war in the region, we have to end the Islamic Republic. The root cause of chaos.' Another speaker added, 'This is about national security... There is no getting around dismembering this Islamic Republic. It is non-negotiable. It is not a want to have. It is a have to have. And it's not just for the Iranian people.'